Broscodolo

3y

Who is following this story?

Last week Adam22 and Danny Mullen interviewed a Trans Woman that Housephone had previously been involved with. She proceeded to out him on the podcast and despite Housephone asking Adam to edit it out it made it into the final edit.

Recently No Jumper has pretty much become a reality show involving beefs with co-hosts, other podcasts, random gang members. This might be the lowest it has gotten though.

Housephone recently lost his mother who he lived with leading to him basically being homeless for a little while. Also been going through a lot of health s*** and very public addiction issues.

Imagine your own boss doing some s*** like this knowing you have that much already on your plate.

Van Lathan Tweet

Housephone breaks the whole thing down around 38 min mark:

Housephone and Ak speaking on the situation:

Housephone's Girlfriend speaking on the situation:

iluvmusic123

3y

lmao the goal is to evoke enough emotion in you that you stay tuned

deceased

3y

Ok so I think it’s really gross to do this in general as “exposing” someone’s sexual history is nobodies business and doing this for clout is so grimy.
But I have to mention, you’re not being outed it you’re a straight man who had relations with a trans woman… she’s a woman. You’re still straight. Thinking otherwise is transphobic and just as ugly.

Mac Wit Da Cheese

3y

Trans or not I wouldn’t want ppl talking about who I f***ed on air

Babaláwo

3y

From how some of yall are moving, simply not liking women with d***s is transphobic.

sfsorrow

3y

This is so disingenuous it’s actually comedy

insertcoolnamehere

3y

It's the fact @blonded of all people is saying this that's the real funny part.

sniper

3y

theres been entire books written on this subject

as much as twitter heads like to think otherwise, these types of convos can’t be simply reduced to sloganeering, even if i agree with them, the foundations have to be explained

its like leaving the conversation on gay/bi/pan, etc. ppl to simply being “born this way”

insertcoolnamehere

3y

· edited

its like leaving the conversation on gay/bi/pan, etc. ppl to simply being “born this way”

but that's what they are.

a lot of yall are literally being oblivious rn to the act of how exhausting it is to have to educate the validity of your own f***ing existence.

Which makes sense, a lot of people ITT are cacs (regardless of sexual orientation, VERY IMPORTANT btw.) and already are coming from a position of not having to deal with being randomly badgered or assumed the worst because of how you chose to exist in a world that's....primarily still ran by racist, sexist, and transphobic cacs.

Like...as a straight cis black nigga, I STILL gotta deal with validating my own existence just because of my hair or appearance at times with people assuming the worst of me. Imagine that tenfold + an addition generalizing into a "insert person with a d***" in public conversations and then expecting THAT same person to just go into said conversation with the "open mind" to educate, just to still have s*** thrown back at you?

Like....yeah conversation is needed but you gotta draw a hard f***ing line in the sand. This devil's advocate "but think of the poor people in fear that discriminate and treat trans people bad you gotta just educate them" ass view is the same moderate ass s*** that defended crackers for kicking our asses for decades talm about "see it from their pov"

Trans woman are DYING right now. So no, I'm not coddling niggas on the other side of the line with "aw there there poor misguided baby" ass rhetoric.

And I ask like in most threads that deal with this subject matter that KTT consistently fails on, forget about having a friend, how many of yall itt even have trans people that you just...like know in real life? Like how many people ITT have had interactions with trans people that aint just "cannon fodder" for online debates?

VeggieKubernetes

3y

What do you mean validating your existence bc of your hair

Not argumentative just curious bc that’s pretty heavy handed rhetoric lol.

I’ve seen the memes of a boomer touching someone’s dreads if that is what you mean

VeggieKubernetes

3y

What do you mean validating your existence bc of your hair

Not argumentative just curious bc that’s pretty heavy handed rhetoric lol.

I’ve seen the memes of a boomer touching someone’s dreads if that is what you mean

insertcoolnamehere

3y

It's the fact @blonded of all people is saying this that's the real funny part.

blonded

3y

more power to yall who think slogans change peoples mind

insertcoolnamehere

3y

-literal embodiment of this but aight you got it man lol.

I see someone made some new years resolutions

blonded

3y

as long as we're both for trans advocacy feel free to think whatever you want about me

insertcoolnamehere

3y

everything you're saying is giving leeway to the exact people that are marginalizing them please tell how that's trans advocacy mr. "moderate"

insertcoolnamehere

3y

you not understanding how dehumanizing trans woman like this undermines your whole entire point is wild lol.

Like, it's when you address them like this that puts you in the "y'know he might not be transphobic but he sure does have a not so nice way of addressing them as" like no other subsets of people are described by their f***ing genitalia like that without being looked at as crazy for it lol.

blonded

3y

again;

tell 20 people trans women are women
tell 20 people /why/ trans women are women, how gender and sexuality work, build the foundations of that argument

tell me which one is more likely to elicit change