Fine. But I come itt thinking there may be a way to abolish landlords under capitalism but I don’t learn anything about it. Then I wish this thread was about capitalism vs socialism instead.
thats kinda the thing tho.
capitalists will never allow for the abolishment of landlords because that would be at odds with its subscription to the profit motive, where everything including land can be a commodity. so even if it was technically possible, it would never happen under capitalism
so the logical conclusion would be that we need to move to a socialist society.
He's been arguing for years though, I can't comprehend that he is trolling.
i don't troll and the guy youre quoting is simply some reactionary weirdo.
Synops wants to watch the world burn
he lost me when he tried to describe a world without interest (free debt only)
thats kinda the thing tho.
capitalists will never allow for the abolishment of landlords because that would be at odds with its subscription to the profit motive, where everything including land can be a commodity. so even if it was technically possible, it would never happen under capitalism
so the logical conclusion would be that we need to move to a socialist society.
Do you believe one can play by the rules of capitalism to make positive changes in the world?
you said "they give people places to live"
You missed out the "bro" that was the most key part, but yes I did...you can't claim to not know after making this thread
he lost me when he tried to describe a world without interest (free debt only)
when did i do this?
i mean i don't think anything resolved around profit and all that s*** should be a thing anyway
Do you believe one can play by the rules of capitalism to make positive changes in the world?
At a certain scale yes
You missed out the "bro" that was the most key part, but yes I did...you can't claim to not know after making this thread
so u were trolling or?
thats kinda the thing tho.
capitalists will never allow for the abolishment of landlords because that would be at odds with its subscription to the profit motive, where everything including land can be a commodity. so even if it was technically possible, it would never happen under capitalism
so the logical conclusion would be that we need to move to a socialist society.
I mean capitalism has the idea of a consumer to counteract that.
The problem with bad landlords is the lack of alternatives available. The Covid-19 situation is very unique and it's the deepest recession in decades. The situations you see occurring rn are not systemic or comparable to problems with lack of affordable housing during a booming economy. We see middle/working class rn suffering who don't have housing benefits, not just the usual poor.
For the current situation rent/mortgage payments freezes are the solution, but Mitch McConnell doesn't want to support that. He's even been holding off on more aid being put out more businesses even, not even just the households.
Under normal circumstances I think systems like section 8 work fine and would be better off being expanded while things like project/public housing are cut. Section 8 housing is not always in bad areas, not of the long it's situated in middle to even upper middle neighborhoods. It's a workable solution along with implementation of basic income.
He's been arguing for years though, I can't comprehend that he is trolling.
Here is an example of his nonsense that he has been at for years over 300k+ posts:


Whilst I do agree with the stance in this thread, he is absolutely trolling because he is bored. He is inconsistent and does not provide any arguments. You disagree with him and he will claim you are a troll and put you on ignore. If you ask him to take it to a place where the discussion might thrive, as you asked, he will tell you he wants to discuss with 'normal people'. Then he will turn around and tell you ktt is filled with imbeciles and racists.
I mean capitalism has the idea of a consumer to counteract that.
The problem with bad landlords is the lack of alternatives available. The Covid-19 situation is very unique and it's the deepest recession in decades. The situations you see occurring rn are not systemic or comparable to problems with lack of affordable housing during a booming economy. We see middle/working class rn suffering who don't have housing benefits, not just the usual poor.
For the current situation rent/mortgage payments freezes are the solution, but Mitch McConnell doesn't want to support that. He's even been holding off on more aid being put out more businesses even, not even just the households.
Under normal circumstances I think systems like section 8 work fine and would be better off being expanded while things like project/public housing are cut. Section 8 housing is not always in bad areas, not of the long it's situated in middle to even upper middle neighborhoods. It's a workable solution along with implementation of basic income.
so if even during the best of times there will be homeless people and a lack of affordable housing, doesn't that tell you something about the system?
not at all
So if landlords go away
do you think the houses just disappear?
So if landlords go away
do you think the houses just disappear?
lmao how are you plucking these questions from thin air
Well you won't ever solve homelessness, but we do have too much of it. And it goes beyond the economic system you want to be using. That said, there's a lot of work/policy that can help out a lot like basic income and section 8 expansion that isn't mutually exclusive to a capitalism.
also true. Stalin was kinda trash at the end of the day and its funny seeing how the tables turned with more people in Russia despising him and more people in the States growing to like him and what he stood for
i think "kinda trash" is a bit light on someone who induced a famine which killed 4 million people
lmao how are you plucking these questions from thin air
you said they give people places to live
so that implies if there were no landlords, people wouldn't have places to live
if this were the case, if landlords disappeared those places would disappear. you see how this is illogical right?
I mean culture changes. These riots have accomplished banning chokeholds nationally and defunding has started. NYC cutting their budget by $1B is a pretty big deal.
Hardly wholesale changes
also lol at public housing cuts
Projects are a failure please don't even try to argue that.
Well you won't ever solve homelessness, but we do have too much of it. And it goes beyond the economic system you want to be using. That said, there's a lot of work/policy that can help out a lot like basic income and section 8 expansion that isn't mutually exclusive to a capitalism.
@Synopsis
the idea that we won't ever "solve homelessness" is also false. there is a very, very easy solution for it.
you said they give people places to live
so that implies if there were no landlords, people wouldn't have places to live
if this were the case, if landlords disappeared those places would disappear. you see how this is illogical right?
Lol plucked from thin air like I said