goretex 💁🏽♂️Sep 10, 2025
Free YoungBoyIf an artist that Drake doesn’t like does well then it’s botted. If Drake does well then it’s legit.
That’s unironically how they think
But.... but thats literally the truth
- goretex 💁🏽♂️Sep 10, 2025
Sep 10, 2025·1 replyBlue ManThey wouldn't have issues reporting statistics if their stats wasn't so easy to to inflate. They push their monthly listeners and chart numbers as a measure for music consumption so the least they could do is be more responsible.
This shtick of reporting fake inflated numbers and then going back to quietly clean them up is very unethical
but the reporting is irrelevant except in earnings reports where numbers are shown through paid subscription/ad revenue etc. This s*** is just for entertainment and engagement for them and not a high priority whatsoever.
if spotify wants to stop sharing these numbers or better charge paid subscription for this data, its valid.
Outside of niche crowd engagement (myself included) , this s*** serves very little benefit.
Sep 10, 2025mangotflu@Kr0niic
week 41 global spotify
Her Loss 55th
GNX 69thwhats up bro? quiet now aren't you?
GNX is falling to FATD levels of irrelevancy, even with Kendrick twerking for the industry
Week 41 stats
They doing anything for a w atp- Sep 10, 2025·2 repliesExpert
but the reporting is irrelevant except in earnings reports where numbers are shown through paid subscription/ad revenue etc. This s*** is just for entertainment and engagement for them and not a high priority whatsoever.
if spotify wants to stop sharing these numbers or better charge paid subscription for this data, its valid.
Outside of niche crowd engagement (myself included) , this s*** serves very little benefit.
What you just said doesn't have anything to do with their numbers being easy to inflate and their numbers reporting being unethical. you're just typing to type
- Sep 10, 2025·1 replyBlue Man
What you just said doesn't have anything to do with their numbers being easy to inflate and their numbers reporting being unethical. you're just typing to type
If it’s so unreliable then why do you yourself post Spotify numbers. Is it oochie Wally or is it one mic
- Sep 10, 2025·1 replyFree YoungBoy
If it’s so unreliable then why do you yourself post Spotify numbers. Is it oochie Wally or is it one mic
make your point instead of trolling
- Sep 10, 2025·1 replyBlue Man
make your point instead of trolling
I’m not making a point I’m asking a question.
- Sep 10, 2025·1 replyFree YoungBoy
I’m not making a point I’m asking a question.
You trying to. you're just being p**** about it
Sep 10, 2025·2 replieswhose alt is Blue Man any theories
- Sep 10, 2025·1 replyBlue Man
You trying to. you're just being p**** about it
If you think Spotify is so unreliable and it’s so easy to game the streams then why do you post Spotify stats when they favor artists you like?
It’s a pretty basic question. Idk why you’re dodging it lol
- Sep 10, 2025·2 repliesBlue Man
What you just said doesn't have anything to do with their numbers being easy to inflate and their numbers reporting being unethical. you're just typing to type
its not easy to report though, daily reporting requires infrastructure costs which aren't justifiable.
I have worked with the biggest companies and simple s*** like updating databases and sharing it publicly with a front end at this scale can cost millions.
Playing with numbers is unethical yes, no one is disagreeing but spotify has no real incentive to prioritize publicly sharing the numbers daily be it ethical or unethical. This s*** is nice to have.
As a shareholder, I would want my financial numbers and subscriber count to be reported correctly, rest is just entertainment.
- Sep 10, 2025·1 replyExpert
its not easy to report though, daily reporting requires infrastructure costs which aren't justifiable.
I have worked with the biggest companies and simple s*** like updating databases and sharing it publicly with a front end at this scale can cost millions.
Playing with numbers is unethical yes, no one is disagreeing but spotify has no real incentive to prioritize publicly sharing the numbers daily be it ethical or unethical. This s*** is nice to have.
As a shareholder, I would want my financial numbers and subscriber count to be reported correctly, rest is just entertainment.
Not sure if you're being obtuse or not. If it was just entertainment, they wouldn't spend the millions they do to report those numbers. Their reporting serves as an advertisement for their service and artists.
Inflating the numbers makes spotify and certain artists look like they are popping more than in reality. If the public loses trust in the numbers being real, they lose a big part of their revenue and are then incentivized to make a course correction. This is capitalism. No company is doing all this for fun
Sep 10, 2025·1 replyBlue Man really ruined this thread even more
IQ 20 poster
Sep 10, 2025John Mauvewhose alt is Blue Man any theories
User from 2019
He might just become unemployed and decided to pursue ktt as a job
Sep 10, 2025·2 repliesExpertits not easy to report though, daily reporting requires infrastructure costs which aren't justifiable.
I have worked with the biggest companies and simple s*** like updating databases and sharing it publicly with a front end at this scale can cost millions.
Playing with numbers is unethical yes, no one is disagreeing but spotify has no real incentive to prioritize publicly sharing the numbers daily be it ethical or unethical. This s*** is nice to have.
As a shareholder, I would want my financial numbers and subscriber count to be reported correctly, rest is just entertainment.
If the costs weren't justifiable, they'd drop the charts. Clearly that isn't the case.
- Sep 10, 2025·1 reply
Anyways is new drake flopping or not
Surprised its not the topic of discussion
- Sep 10, 2025·2 replies
1B+
- Sep 10, 2025·1 replyTHEREALHNDRXXFREE
Anyways is new drake flopping or not
Surprised its not the topic of discussion
Flopping
Drake stans are quiet about it
- Sep 10, 2025·1 replyMidzy
If the costs weren't justifiable, they'd drop the charts. Clearly that isn't the case.
its negligent, it creates engagement with niche crowd. If the charts are dropped, there will be minimal impact on the stock price which shows the true impact.
- Gosh 😹Sep 10, 2025Blue Man
Not sure if you're being obtuse or not. If it was just entertainment, they wouldn't spend the millions they do to report those numbers. Their reporting serves as an advertisement for their service and artists.
Inflating the numbers makes spotify and certain artists look like they are popping more than in reality. If the public loses trust in the numbers being real, they lose a big part of their revenue and are then incentivized to make a course correction. This is capitalism. No company is doing all this for fun
Drake stans lost trust in everyone’s numbers but drakes after the battle and there were no repercussions, Drake stans still die by streams regardless
- Sep 10, 2025·1 replyMidzy
If the costs weren't justifiable, they'd drop the charts. Clearly that isn't the case.
He's implying that artists are out here botting numbers by millions for "niche engagement"
- Sep 10, 2025Free YoungBoy
If you think Spotify is so unreliable and it’s so easy to game the streams then why do you post Spotify stats when they favor artists you like?
It’s a pretty basic question. Idk why you’re dodging it lol
🦆
Sep 10, 2025It’s really simple
Drakes streams = 100% legitimate
Everyone else’s streams = 100% botted and fake
- Sep 10, 2025mov
Flopping
Drake stans are quiet about it
Not surprised
Song should been callled Dog S***