? Who said otherwise. You’re going through it 😭

You’re the one defending NOKIA for running ads to view the boost count

No, he is suing because he believed they did something illegal and not allowed.

Even if they actually didn’t do that, it doesn’t change what he was suing in regards to.

Drake won

You can’t just sue someone because you think something happened without any grounds or reasoning to believe it happened

The original lawsuit was using DJ Akademiks videos as evidence

So… the DJ Akademiks videos were his reasoning?.. therefore he wasn’t suing without reasoning.

It may be dumb/questionable reasoning, but it is reasoning nonetheless

summer 2025😈🦉

MAGA playbook
What’s next? Adin Ross stream? Oh wait

I'm out her looking for revenge all summer 2025😈😈

All repping one thing 👌🏿👌🏿🦉

So if I say Nike owes me a billion dollars and the reasoning is the voices in my head, can I sue them?

Nigga said DJ Akademiks videos were valid enough evidence to file lawsuits over, cackling

The same DJ Akademiks that is a Drake fanboy and posts biased/inaccurate information all the time to support Drake

The lawsuit was quite literally filed and accepted, so apparently they were. Like I’m not sure what you want me to tell you?

Nah

You just said a DJ Akademiks video is valid enough evidence to support the theory that Not Like Us was botted. You are insane

No you’re just quite literally slow.

He had reasoning behind his claims. Whether the reasoning was valid or accurate in the sense of being true is seperate and would’ve been determined when the lawsuit proceeded in court.

However he did not sue “without any reasoning”.

so im guessing the ovhoes support spotify again? 😭

they can't hide their bottling anymore😂😂

If you listen to kpop don’t talk to me about hip hop