And then commended for her “bravery” during such “tough times”.

Like police didn’t show up to her house and found his side of the bed like this

and then acted like the police were wrong to charge because the victim took back his statement when she admitted at the scene of the crime she did it.

“A section from the police incident report was read out in court earlier, in which Ms Flack said: "I did it, I whacked him round the head like that", gesturing a swinging motion with her right hand to police.”

“She told officers "I hit him, he was cheating on me"…”

i banned that reddit the moment i saw it

i made a bit of an overly fiery comment but yeah f*** them

It was a little odd to me too. Felt like this.

You know that s*** happens as well, either by a “source” just spreading misinformation or a writer trying to get a come up.

It's heating up

What are the validity of these sources and how RS vet them lol

Welp

This is what I wanna know too

Reads like a hit piece, from the little parts I've read so far. Also, really s***ty to publish an article with off the record rumours like this, or unnamed sources, right when it was starting to look up for Majors in the current case. Wow.

its over again

So right when there’s validity to the fact she might get arrested due to all of this the RS piece drops lol

This Hollywood s*** is something

Timing of the Rolling Stone article is interesting to say the least lmao

It’s like they waited for something to go his way to drop it

At this point, let it play out. If he’s innocent, I think he should commit to some behavioral classes or something and change. He’s gonna have to rebuild his reputation

I'm sure he'll be fine

Like I said the other day. If him being an a****** in the past isn't relevant to this particular case, then it don't matter. Let's focus on the evidence at hand now.

Is this really new info though? Like yeah the timing is odd but right after he was arrested a bunch of information about him being abusive and a piece of s*** on set/in school came out. This is a very thorough follow-up of that already known information.

what reddit?

This is the part of the thread where the true illiterate bigots reveal themselves

Hurr durr big magazine says nuh uhh he actually is bad man

This s*** getting messier as the day goes on

Imma just check in on August 3rd to see the result

Rolling Stone = garbage journalism

I knew they weren’t going to let him look good in the positive light

also sidenote why is it Rolling Stone only does hitpieces and controversial lists now? Has it always been like that?

Because print media has been on its death throes more and more as the years go by