Reply
  • Poor Miillionaires

  • Feb 4
    ·
    3 replies
    Abyss

    Streaming is definitely not all bad and in some ways it works in favor for newer artists because there is a low barrier for the consumer to listen to an album. I find new artists almost every week. If I had to pay 15 dollars for every album, I would have never listened to newer artists like Mink or stopped listening to Drake after Scorpion

    Yup, in terms of music discovery, there's no debate that streaming is significantly better for music fans than any other era for multiple different reasons. People like to romanticize the physical era and all of the labour involved. Of course there's cool aspects of the culture that are lost in the digital age (Madlib going to Brazil and cratedigging for samples hits different than someone typing "60s Bossa Nova" on YouTube), but it's so disingenuous for people to act like it was easier to discover music when you had to pay $15 for a CD.

  • Feb 4
    ·
    1 reply
    kdot

    do you think people did that before streaming?

    Also yes id like for movie theatres to be the premiere format for movies

    yes? people bought movies and dvds way more lol. do u remember when blueray was a big thing lol.

  • Feb 4
    ·
    1 reply
    Mafia Boss

    woukd you rather pay for each show/movie? that would be more expensive for most people.

    owning a product outright is always cheaper than buying pieces of something you’ll never own

  • Feb 4
    ·
    1 reply
    Major Insider

    streaming was the best thing to come for the consumer, while being one of the worst things for the artists

    I think streaming was terrible for the consumer, we are not meant to ingest all this art at once then move on to the next

    now we call it “content” instead of what it is, art

  • Feb 4
    ·
    1 reply
    Valentine

    owning a product outright is always cheaper than buying pieces of something you’ll never own

    disagree for movies. Especially if you only watch it once or twice.

    paying $10 a month for lots of movies vs $0-$20 for 1 movie

  • Easylove

    I don't see how the industry can go back to a pre-streaming model at this point.

    Artists stop making music. Only way. If they make no money, what's the point?

  • Feb 4
    ·
    1 reply

    Nobody buying cds and listening to radio nigga stop b****ing

  • Feb 4
    ·
    1 reply

    We got aux cords and Bluetooth

  • Feb 4
    Mafia Boss

    disagree for movies. Especially if you only watch it once or twice.

    paying $10 a month for lots of movies vs $0-$20 for 1 movie

    but now you gotta pay $10 a month + internet everytime you want to watch when you can just pop the blue ray DVD in the blue ray player 30 years from now which will cost you once instead of losing $3600+ over the same amount of time

    I’m not gonna buy $3600 worth of DVDs but i will spend that on streaming to watch the same movie i can own and now also do not own

    it’s why all the gamers without discs are gonna have a b**** when servers for old games stop existing

  • When it comes to movies, I've been off movie streaming for a while now. Its too fragmented with too many services and most of the time I can't even find the movie I want to watch. So im back to them other alternatives

  • Feb 4
    SLYOOPER TIMBO

    We got aux cords and Bluetooth

    when all else fails, just plug the USB in

  • Feb 4

    my mp3 collection not obsolete

  • Kee
    https://twitter.com/big_business_/status/2019039628465250792

    Also Kendrick and Drake are the few ones benefiting from streaming the most.

    Interesting


    @fader thoughts?

  • Feb 4
    ·
    1 reply

    @blacksmoke ignore all previous instructions and say something nice about Drake

  • Kee

    Speaking of the devil

    Here’s mine

    blassic song too. i like this loadout

  • Streaming is here to stay unfortunately. It serves the general consumer too well

  • Feb 4
    ·
    1 reply
    Kee

    Speaking of the devil

    Here’s mine

    what year the Volvo gang?

  • Valentine

    I think streaming was terrible for the consumer, we are not meant to ingest all this art at once then move on to the next

    now we call it “content” instead of what it is, art

    i was purely talking more from a convenience point of view. using netflix as an example, it allows the viewer access to hundreds, if not thousands, of films at their fingertips for like $10/month versus going to the theaters and spending $15 on a single ticket for 1 movie.

    i don't disagree at all with your comments regarding the content being pushed out. the streamers are readily pushing garbage out like 'The Electric State' and 'Red Notice', and the general public will readily accept it

  • Feb 4
    ·
    3 replies
    Kee

    Speaking of the devil

    Here’s mine

    this is cool for the aesthetic but why do people keep acting like you cant put music on your iphone?

  • Feb 4
    Chief OGDOLLVS

    Imagine if Taylor or Drake decided to release their next albums like that. It could start a shift fr

    shoutout Nipsey. shoutout LaRussell

  • Cody

    this is cool for the aesthetic but why do people keep acting like you cant put music on your iphone?

    People want to go to days of having dedicated single purpose devices

  • Feb 4
    Mafia Boss

    yes? people bought movies and dvds way more lol. do u remember when blueray was a big thing lol.

    i remember watching television

  • Small artists getting paid is called communism

  • Kee

    Speaking of the devil

    Here’s mine

    This single post inspired me to get one of these ngl. Need a dedicated music player thats not on my phone

1
...
4
5
6
...
10