Reply
  • ·
    edited

    I didn’t necessarily hate Gunn’s short lived DCU but he did this to himself. I get that he loves making projects out of the weirder oddball side characters or the more obscure, but now was not the time for that and it’s not what the masses wanted to kick off a brand new extended universe. Outside of Superman & Supergirl he completely dragged his feet on introducing any other major players and this is cost of that.

  • Himothee

    Yeah this how I see it, they’re wiping the slate clean after MoT and rebooting again. Right now the news is still fresh so they’ll pretend like everything’s gravy but it’s over

    Not like a whole bunch of main characters were cast yet though from the top DC names. And people seem to really like David. I can see maybe rebooting story wise but cast wise I think at least most would return if they want.

  • Himothee

    It’s hilarious seeing mfs try and argue that this was a money move. The money would’ve been keeping Gunn and Safran in charge. This was 100% ideological

  • ·
    1 reply
    BurgerBoi777

    I think this only happens is man of tomorrow does the flash type numbers

    If it makes 750 mill or higher I think they talk themselves into believing interest is still rising for this universe and kick the can down the road

    You thinking about it financially bro which isn’t wrong but this whole paramount merger deal is a financial nightmare. It was never about the money. MoT could make a billi and they still freeing Gunn

  • Grace randolph won

  • Himothee

    It’s hilarious seeing mfs try and argue that this was a money move. The money would’ve been keeping Gunn and Safran in charge. This was 100% ideological

    I think if it’s to shift towards focusing on higher profile “safer” characters and projects it’s a bit of both

  • ·
    1 reply
    Himothee

    It’s hilarious seeing mfs try and argue that this was a money move. The money would’ve been keeping Gunn and Safran in charge. This was 100% ideological

    superman didnt crack a billion. You are at times missing out on major money on the table by not having a director that has said less politically and makes a more likeable product.

    they knew his ideology before the merger, before visiting the set, before appointing him to the skydance ceo team

    what new has chnaged that would lead to ideology issues if he is still working for them

  • ·
    2 replies
    Himothee

    You thinking about it financially bro which isn’t wrong but this whole paramount merger deal is a financial nightmare. It was never about the money. MoT could make a billi and they still freeing Gunn

    clayface and supergirl cost money to make

    add up their budgets then you can throw in lanterns budget peacemaker season 2 compared to how much that money could make on a batman, wonder woman movie

    that is what ellison is looking at profit

    not even limited to good reviews
    not ratings on tv views

    PROFIT

  • hit me that the last dcu project gonna be a gorilla grodd show

  • ·
    1 reply

    Forgot about the transformers one marketing…

    Only thing I remember from that is some dude on Twitter dedicating his account to it.

  • HaroldsChicken

    clayface and supergirl cost money to make

    add up their budgets then you can throw in lanterns budget peacemaker season 2 compared to how much that money could make on a batman, wonder woman movie

    that is what ellison is looking at profit

    not even limited to good reviews
    not ratings on tv views

    PROFIT

    Clayface is literally making bank rn tho

  • relapsed bisexual

    hit me that the last dcu project gonna be a gorilla grodd show

    Introducing all the villains and then never seeing any of them again

  • NobodyWins

    Forgot about the transformers one marketing…

    https://twitter.com/thwipt_/status/2119927901420405171

    Only thing I remember from that is some dude on Twitter dedicating his account to it.

    i like when u can take one look at someone and tell they are an utterly soulless human being

  • ·
    1 reply

    People keep saying "its just supergirl that flopped " well yeah but that is an expensive ass flop. the marketing deals helped some but that flop was a lot for a movie in the second year of the universe . Marvel can afford to do that now but you cant afford to do that early in a universe. S*** you cant afford to do that movie 2 of a 3 movie series.

    Clayface was always a fun art project not expecting crazy returns. If Supergirl did just reasonable then we may not be having this conversation but it did terrible in terms of sales. Reviews mixed.

  • supergirl flopped harder than morbius, that s*** brazy

  • BrainWorms4U

    Clayface is literally making bank rn tho

    yeah but I am saying you add up both supergirl and clayface budgets

    supergirl 170-186
    clayface luckily just 40 million

    but 210-226 million and supergirl didnt make back its budget

  • ·
    3 replies
    HaroldsChicken

    clayface and supergirl cost money to make

    add up their budgets then you can throw in lanterns budget peacemaker season 2 compared to how much that money could make on a batman, wonder woman movie

    that is what ellison is looking at profit

    not even limited to good reviews
    not ratings on tv views

    PROFIT

    Bro if they cared about profit they wouldn’t have brought WB, they’re $87 billion in debt cus of the buyout

  • HaroldsChicken

    People keep saying "its just supergirl that flopped " well yeah but that is an expensive ass flop. the marketing deals helped some but that flop was a lot for a movie in the second year of the universe . Marvel can afford to do that now but you cant afford to do that early in a universe. S*** you cant afford to do that movie 2 of a 3 movie series.

    Clayface was always a fun art project not expecting crazy returns. If Supergirl did just reasonable then we may not be having this conversation but it did terrible in terms of sales. Reviews mixed.

    second movie in the universe and supergirl was getting big reactions after her cameo in superman

    SG was a disaster

  • Himothee

    Bro if they cared about profit they wouldn’t have brought WB, they’re $87 billion in debt cus of the buyout

    you think they bought them for the love of the art man they do care about profit to use the characters to make more money then they are CURRENTLY MAKING. Thats the goal.

  • relapsed bisexual

    second movie in the universe and supergirl was getting big reactions after her cameo in superman

    SG was a disaster

    Ending Superman having her call Superman a b**** probably wasnt the best idea. making Supergirl an edgelord and doing a story where she is an alcohoilc to grieve and s***trafficking in space for your second movie in a universe that people loved for being more upbeat and less dark is an abhorrently stupid decision

    yes its a comic book but a comic book and its fans arent always going to show up for you in the theaters same as anime and game fans.

    Minecraft made a dumb accessible product.

    Resident Evil made an accessible dumbed down product

    doing fan service of a comic with the director having not even read the comic with a nihilistic woman character when women characters in cbm and hero s*** already struggle to get great movies is kind of dumb to me.

  • Himothee

    Bro if they cared about profit they wouldn’t have brought WB, they’re $87 billion in debt cus of the buyout

  • $87b in debt and you need Ellison to get you out is so funny

  • ·
    1 reply

    “It’s too bloated and some characters and even easter eggs may not make the final cut, which is why they had to fire him now, and not wait to the end of his contract in April,” the insider continued.

    We said this from the jump
    Lmaooo

  • no s*** they care about maximizing profit from companies they purchased . What else is the purpose. Also control of companies like tik tok to control media. Then once they in their mind improve value of company or rights to characters they can sell off. Not saying it will be solved through a singular movie or they see profits super quickly or at all.

    If you think Supergirl flopping for the cost it took to create played no part in this cool man if you think this all just came down to ideology then what? he was always lying about keeping gunn? He fliipped when he saw Gunn post he voted?

    I told yall Gunn would be out before man of tomorrow or right after and was told "nuh uh he visited the set and he said they staying"

    now you going with something else entirely

  • TheNIQ

    “It’s too bloated and some characters and even easter eggs may not make the final cut, which is why they had to fire him now, and not wait to the end of his contract in April,” the insider continued.

    We said this from the jump
    Lmaooo

    The insider