Reply
  • Dec 16, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
    Banana Clip

    You say "undetectable" but they literally detected the drones "in the vicinity" now who's not making sense? Satellites are ancient technology at this point and who's to say there was even one above the base at the correct time to be used for surveillance.

    You are especially over estimating base defense on our own home territory, there is little threat and therefore little use for investment in systems that would down unidentified drones within minutes when detected in the vicinity of the base because there is little credible threat that deep in america.

    The more credible and interesting sightings of these type of drones, to me, are the ones seen by Naval forces out at sea because they are actually out there with active defenses and detection.

    Also just because there are ways to "take over drones" doesn't mean they are operational or in any large scale production use for defense of a base.

    Undetectable because no one to this very moment has been able to crack the radio frequencies these craft are operating on. It’s very easy for a civilian drone to be identified because the military already has anti drone technology that detects the radio signals drones give off to communicate to the controller of the drone user. Once you have acquired the frequency of the drone you can jam the signal to interrupt video output. We even have anti drone rifles that the military has purchased the technology for and are on standby for mass production if the need ever comes.

    We are currently using this technology and there are a few drones that are undetectable to our anti drone capabilities. Nobody has been able find out the frequency these things are being used on to bring it down with a radar jam to disable them , jam the video screen, or etc .

    Also interesting you say satellites are ancient technology but the intelligence community refuses to release numerous high resolution images of these UFOs because they consider such pictures a threat to national security if they were released to the public. The navy has pictures of tic-tac ufo literally less than 100m away from the carrier that will never see the light of day because how heavily redacted the encounter was. So I definitely would not discount the fact the US military and NASA has been casually documenting ufo phenomenon only to turn around and classify everything

  • DumpKing

    Undetectable because no one to this very moment has been able to crack the radio frequencies these craft are operating on. It’s very easy for a civilian drone to be identified because the military already has anti drone technology that detects the radio signals drones give off to communicate to the controller of the drone user. Once you have acquired the frequency of the drone you can jam the signal to interrupt video output. We even have anti drone rifles that the military has purchased the technology for and are on standby for mass production if the need ever comes.

    We are currently using this technology and there are a few drones that are undetectable to our anti drone capabilities. Nobody has been able find out the frequency these things are being used on to bring it down with a radar jam to disable them , jam the video screen, or etc .

    Also interesting you say satellites are ancient technology but the intelligence community refuses to release numerous high resolution images of these UFOs because they consider such pictures a threat to national security if they were released to the public. The navy has pictures of tic-tac ufo literally less than 100m away from the carrier that will never see the light of day because how heavily redacted the encounter was. So I definitely would not discount the fact the US military and NASA has been casually documenting ufo phenomenon only to turn around and classify everything

    believe the government111!1!1!!111

  • Dec 16, 2024

    S*** is fake
    Idgaf
    They tryna prep us for war with Iran

  • Dec 16, 2024
    Ralph Cifaretto

    LOL NO! This is an actual serious and down bad hunt for a nuke. We don’t know the perpetrators yet but they want to detonate it before Christmas. This ain’t NO JOKE!!!

    is there any evidence for this other than that guy on tik tok?

  • Dec 17, 2024
    ·
    1 reply

    White House is saying they're misidentified or commercial drones, police drones or hobbyists and nothing is wrong 😐

    foxnews.com/media/drones-flying-over-country-lawful-nothing-indicates-public-safety-risk-says-top-wh-official.amp

  • Dec 17, 2024

    DHS admitted its drones?

  • Dec 17, 2024

    tf goin on in jersey keep getting notifications about it on ring

  • Dec 17, 2024
    u ok jay

    White House is saying they're misidentified or commercial drones, police drones or hobbyists and nothing is wrong 😐

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/drones-flying-over-country-lawful-nothing-indicates-public-safety-risk-says-top-wh-official.amp

    100% they’re searching for something

  • Dec 17, 2024
    Elric

    https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1hg2sgs/1216_ua2359_ord_to_ewr/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

    Clearly not “hobby drone peeps”

    Crazy

  • Dec 17, 2024
    Elric

    https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1hg2sgs/1216_ua2359_ord_to_ewr/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

    thats wild

  • Dec 17, 2024
    Elric

    https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1hg2sgs/1216_ua2359_ord_to_ewr/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

    that's crazy

  • Elric

    https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1hg2sgs/1216_ua2359_ord_to_ewr/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

    WTAF 😳

  • Dec 17, 2024

    this guy has historically had awful takes, i really doubt he's super tapped in. but what he says here is concerning if you choose to believe him (i think he's just as informed as us so yaknow). only reason i'm sharing is because it's from Forbes who are generally trustworthy. but teeters on unfounded fear mongering

    youtu.be/el3bS5QJDbU?si=PUVz7PfTLenMM2Dt

  • Dec 17, 2024

    i hope they become podcast or passport bros if they’re actually aliens

  • Dec 17, 2024
    Elric

    https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1hg2sgs/1216_ua2359_ord_to_ewr/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

    The government told me these were teenagers using drones from walmart

  • Dec 17, 2024
    ·
    1 reply

    So wut military doing and why so out in the open

  • Dec 17, 2024
    Elric

    https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1hg2sgs/1216_ua2359_ord_to_ewr/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

  • Ezio 🎰
    Dec 17, 2024
    ·
    2 replies

    I feel like government took a baby alíen to autopista it and conduct experiments and now theres the alíen équivalent of an Amber Alert with every alíen in the galaxy trying to find the kid

  • rvi 🦜
    Dec 17, 2024
    Elric

    https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1hg2sgs/1216_ua2359_ord_to_ewr/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

  • Dec 17, 2024
    ·
    1 reply
    Ezio

    I feel like government took a baby alíen to autopista it and conduct experiments and now theres the alíen équivalent of an Amber Alert with every alíen in the galaxy trying to find the kid

    Da gument took my baby

  • Ezio 🎰
    Dec 17, 2024
    Bo Ceephus

    Da gument took my baby

    We’re f***ed brother

  • Dec 17, 2024

    if this is gods method of showing we are making progress im happy

1
...
17
18
19
...
31