How can you look at history and wonder if this is even a question? Of course there some dudes that used it as a pretext to be absolute creeps but only Americans wonder if nudity has any place in art.

A lot of people are comfortable in the nude my dude it's nbd.

That article kills brain cells. Nevermind that the question itself is absurd.

Art is about life

Nudity is a part of life

Can’t make it anymore simple than that

Oh noooo not naked bodies how we will live with ourselves

Not Verhoeven condemning all nudity in art cause he made one s***ty movie

posing the question

Counter arguement:

How many nude scenes in a movie is as artistic as the countless amounts of paintings or statues?

Plus it can't be used in a sexually charged scene or a shower scene for balance.

But I think this is a discussion of nudity in capitalist hollywood vs some poor artist smuck being paid to make art for a rich guy in the 1500s

the answer is yes

i get banned for this yall gon tell the mods that nudity is natural and part of life??

@ranch_dubois

mormon thread

You could ask a similar question for why super heroes wear spandex. It’s to show off their bodies because it enforces their power, sexiness, and/or makes them look more majestic and inspiring.

We like human bodies, the same way we like human bodies. They’re beautiful.

I agree that this isn’t ban worthy especially in spoiler tags

But just bc mods on KTT think it is doesn’t mean my point doesn’t stand tho

Suppose it depends on how you would define “artistic”.

making this a tough question to answer, for me atleast.

:jordanlaff3:

yes?

Show the titties

Not a counter argument btw

SydoSweeny titties a work of art

A random journalist opinion isn’t important when compared to the impact of thousands of years worth of art.

where the titties at

I didn't expect that scene, the girl is pure flames too

The better question is: who is to say that artistic nudity is not a thing?

AHHHH OOOOOOOGGGGAHHHHH!!!

I love art fr