Reply
  • OP
    ·
    3 replies
    babylon sherm

    Coordinate with him to find a more appropriate start time that will accomodate his schedule and yours

    Feels like it can't be that simple :(

  • LD

    Feels like it can't be that simple :(

    Tag me in I got it

  • LD

    Feels like it can't be that simple :(

    Are you worried about bringing it up? Like that you know about the family situation?

    Just find a way to bring it up. Thank them for being present when going thru s*** and then look for solutions together. Really your job it do help them do that job.

    You are looking to find a solution that fits the needs of all parties. If they are not helping in the situation or not willing to at least have a conversation about what can be done or there stance on it then that's when you need to start escalating s***

  • If it's actually an issue with no known resolution at a local level is when hr is brought in etc etc

  • Then hr will come up with how to fire or reprimand them untill they are a shell of a person or quit

  • This some volunteering s***?

    Bru f*** them tell em to kick rocks

  • ·
    2 replies
    LD

    Thanks for your input

    CARS comes naturally to me, but emotional intelligence is admittedly a weakness

    For interviews so far, rehearsal has honestly helped me a lot

    I guess my issue is I haven't had to deal with many situations like this in the past

    Rehearsal is good up to a point. When I’m listening to candidates it’s really easy to tell when they are telling us something they’ve practiced 100 times and the people who rely on rehearsal are the first ones that get thrown off when you get into probing and follow up questions

    Like I said it’s great if you commit certain ideas to memory and always remember “if they ask this I should definitely make sure to incorporate this in my answer” but it’s best if you always get to that point in different ways. It comes off more natural and it gives you more flexibility in your answer to go one way or another.

    We want to see candidates who are thinking of these questions in real time and coming up with answers in real time. It’s much more revealing than rehearsed answers. There’s nothing wrong with asking for a moment to think about a question if something has you stumped

    If all else fails though and rehearsal really gets you through it then you gotta try and make it as natural as possible. Let other people hear your answers and get feedback from them on how it sounds.

  • Jbreezyondeck

    Not directly answering OP’s question but once I figured out that any decision I make doesn’t have to be defined in a binary right or wrong, life got so much better for me. I make my choices, I try to make the best of them based on who I am and what I’m about

    This kinda thinking got me into all my KTT beefs

  • LD

    Feels like it can't be that simple :(

    I mean, it's phrased simply to make it seem easy. Ironing out schedules within a team while accommodating someone's hardship is rarely simple in execution because it usually involves compromise — you may need to sacrifice some things, and they'll likely have to do the same.

    But the first step really is that easy. "What can we change that will let you show up on time without having to compromise your caregiving duties to your father?" And then you go from there

  • Harlem

    Rehearsal is good up to a point. When I’m listening to candidates it’s really easy to tell when they are telling us something they’ve practiced 100 times and the people who rely on rehearsal are the first ones that get thrown off when you get into probing and follow up questions

    Like I said it’s great if you commit certain ideas to memory and always remember “if they ask this I should definitely make sure to incorporate this in my answer” but it’s best if you always get to that point in different ways. It comes off more natural and it gives you more flexibility in your answer to go one way or another.

    We want to see candidates who are thinking of these questions in real time and coming up with answers in real time. It’s much more revealing than rehearsed answers. There’s nothing wrong with asking for a moment to think about a question if something has you stumped

    If all else fails though and rehearsal really gets you through it then you gotta try and make it as natural as possible. Let other people hear your answers and get feedback from them on how it sounds.

    Giving out game for free, pay him by taking heed

  • ·
    1 reply

  • ASAKI

    This is adhd phobia

  • OP
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    Harlem

    Rehearsal is good up to a point. When I’m listening to candidates it’s really easy to tell when they are telling us something they’ve practiced 100 times and the people who rely on rehearsal are the first ones that get thrown off when you get into probing and follow up questions

    Like I said it’s great if you commit certain ideas to memory and always remember “if they ask this I should definitely make sure to incorporate this in my answer” but it’s best if you always get to that point in different ways. It comes off more natural and it gives you more flexibility in your answer to go one way or another.

    We want to see candidates who are thinking of these questions in real time and coming up with answers in real time. It’s much more revealing than rehearsed answers. There’s nothing wrong with asking for a moment to think about a question if something has you stumped

    If all else fails though and rehearsal really gets you through it then you gotta try and make it as natural as possible. Let other people hear your answers and get feedback from them on how it sounds.

    The way I rehearse is by committing so many examples to memory that I have a story for most types of questions

    This gives me a structure to defend, of which I already know the ins and outs

    Therefore, follow-ups/probes aren't hard either

    But with ethical scenarios, the concepts are new and too many unknowns

    Hence struggle

  • OP

    Already accepted to a good program whose traditional interview went well

    This just raises the stakes, format- and program-wise

  • Sir Real

    It seems like you’re high key extremely autistic

    You still havent answered my question

  • you change the subject like a celebrity with great press training

  • LD

    The way I rehearse is by committing so many examples to memory that I have a story for most types of questions

    This gives me a structure to defend, of which I already know the ins and outs

    Therefore, follow-ups/probes aren't hard either

    But with ethical scenarios, the concepts are new and too many unknowns

    Hence struggle

    That’s okay as long as you have your bases covered and have enough in your arsenal to get you through most questions

    When it comes to questions of ethics it really isn’t about a specific answer we want to hear. I’m not asking you what you if you’d report a colleague for xyz and thinking “if they don’t say yes/no they failed the interview”. It’s really just to know your thought process, know how you approach a dilemma. Some amazing answers I’ve heard were from people who readily admitted that they struggle with ethical dilemma but then went on to do their best with the problem.

    But if you really are looking for something you to fall back on as a “right answer” just remember no judgement, no jumping to conclusions, communication before escalation, and that we’re all part of the same team. Keep these key points in mind and it’ll get you through most EI questions.

  • What in the f*** are you even talking about