MVYHEM

4y

He's mentioned like once

GoodAlbum

4y

can he still be granted bond even if he didn’t get it today?

Wiggler

4y

This s*** is surreal

_SIRIUS_

4y

Why does everyone think Gunna is a snitch?

Yeezy05

4y

im sure he'd rather be blackballed from the industry than have to sit in jail for most of the rest of his life while millions sit in his bank account

Yevin

4y

thug going away for 100 years

Yevin

4y

thug going away for 100 years

Maartins

4y

Let’s not forget the racial dynamics of brian kemps racist, conservative ass being intent on quelling basically the main group representing for the most popping city in hip hop

Not saying YSL is all positive but there are definitely other factors at play.

Growing up in georgia. Atl and the rest of the state have always been at odds moreso than most other big cities and rural areas you find in other states. Basically atl is just a hub of black people and where you find a lot of black millionaires and middle class folks. The conservative ass nature of the state govt has never meshed well with the makeup of atl

krishna bound

4y

@lnstinct

(edit: just to note i left some stuff out below, so there's a bit more i found where i draw the conclusion from but because of the embed limit i didn't want to go overboard and do multiple posts)

looks it is a real entity but it's more complicated. here's my forensic a***ysis below:

firstly, i looked in the US copyright database and there's only 3 copyrights, which is weird because they're all from this year, and two are from the same song

i searched the LLC though and found it is real though

however when searching it up, i found there's two companies, one of which is for publishing and the other which is the above

this one through the copyright database does show more, so yeah the implication is it is real

however, now one thing which is interesting is as you'll notice both of these are registered to the same address in LA. searching this shows up with a generic address, probably a virtual office:

going to the georgia corporation divison, we can get more info based on the trademark, which shows the business separation (which is usual within the industry); however you'll see they are all registered again to the same place and to the same agent, which is a generic registration service

a few interesting things here. firstly, there are documents signed by Thug:

however they're only signed by him with the label of "manager"; not a typical designation used for owners (typically you'd use "president" for example had it been a corp). numerous other documents have other names attached to them. for example, this one:

does amina diop sounds familiar?

that's because it's his manager from 300 entertainment. so someone from 300 entertainment has authorized signing rights over the company, and is labeled as "organizer" for the corporation, while thug himself is only labeled as "manager" - implying that 300 were the actual original organizers of the company's registration, not thug himself

this is an actual important distinction because it's all registered as LLCs; the difference between a LLC & a corp is that for LLCs, ownership is derived from individuals, not derived from shareholders. but there's actually more improtant stuff here - notice how specifically thug is named "Manager".

this is an important distinction for an LLC - it's not just textual.

Manager within a LLC is related to a outside manager

if he was the owner, he'd be labeled "Managing Member" (https://smallbusiness.chron.com/llc-manager-60581.html)

i will note that the ownership on documents is purposefully obscured - everything has gone through agents and outsourced managerial companies - but we can draw conclusions based on the labels of those signing the doucments and their company designations

tl;dr thug got scammed and thinks he owns YSL but he has a glorified authorized signer designation and the ability to pay himself, in reality the company/ies is/are owned by 300 ent entirely

knockknockwhoitis

4y

20 max. Out in 10

americana

4y

Lol cuz there was that thing from him on crime stoppers a year ago

krishna bound

4y

@lnstinct

(edit: just to note i left some stuff out below, so there's a bit more i found where i draw the conclusion from but because of the embed limit i didn't want to go overboard and do multiple posts)

looks it is a real entity but it's more complicated. here's my forensic a***ysis below:

firstly, i looked in the US copyright database and there's only 3 copyrights, which is weird because they're all from this year, and two are from the same song

i searched the LLC though and found it is real though

however when searching it up, i found there's two companies, one of which is for publishing and the other which is the above

this one through the copyright database does show more, so yeah the implication is it is real

however, now one thing which is interesting is as you'll notice both of these are registered to the same address in LA. searching this shows up with a generic address, probably a virtual office:

going to the georgia corporation divison, we can get more info based on the trademark, which shows the business separation (which is usual within the industry); however you'll see they are all registered again to the same place and to the same agent, which is a generic registration service

a few interesting things here. firstly, there are documents signed by Thug:

however they're only signed by him with the label of "manager"; not a typical designation used for owners (typically you'd use "president" for example had it been a corp). numerous other documents have other names attached to them. for example, this one:

does amina diop sounds familiar?

that's because it's his manager from 300 entertainment. so someone from 300 entertainment has authorized signing rights over the company, and is labeled as "organizer" for the corporation, while thug himself is only labeled as "manager" - implying that 300 were the actual original organizers of the company's registration, not thug himself

this is an actual important distinction because it's all registered as LLCs; the difference between a LLC & a corp is that for LLCs, ownership is derived from individuals, not derived from shareholders. but there's actually more improtant stuff here - notice how specifically thug is named "Manager".

this is an important distinction for an LLC - it's not just textual.

Manager within a LLC is related to a outside manager

if he was the owner, he'd be labeled "Managing Member" (https://smallbusiness.chron.com/llc-manager-60581.html)

i will note that the ownership on documents is purposefully obscured - everything has gone through agents and outsourced managerial companies - but we can draw conclusions based on the labels of those signing the doucments and their company designations

tl;dr thug got scammed and thinks he owns YSL but he has a glorified authorized signer designation and the ability to pay himself, in reality the company/ies is/are owned by 300 ent entirely