The Judge may give jurors tomorrow (Friday) off because of Labor Day weekend.
Closing statements are expected to take place on Tuesday, September 8.
I watched the new Channel 5 video of a Death To America rally in Iran and they had a banner that said #FREEDURK
Lil Durk is a symbol of anti-imperialism and he was converting the good people to Islam
I saw that. He also said Cardi was a Cia asset for shaking her ass
OTF Jam’s ex girlfriend Briana Dangerfield testifies. She says she was in a relationship with Kevin Hester when he was in prison. She says she put him out in April of 2022.
Dangerfield: I put him out. I told him he can’t think my house was a revolving door.
She was cooking
Any unbiased opinions? Is durk really cooked or TLR biased?
nigga he very clearly was trying to flee the states and then they got all them texts and s*** lol brother ya boy done
Man this judge is biased as hell. The government has a lot of cherry picked evidence out of context. Especially the don’t book no flights in my name. If that was really about a wedding the judge should allow them to show the full exchange. Why would you block that?
nigga he very clearly was trying to flee the states and then they got all them texts and s*** lol brother ya boy done
damn
Any unbiased opinions? Is durk really cooked or TLR biased?
Honestly, it could go either way. Odds are he’s cooked, but they still haven’t explicitly proven that Durk actually ordered the murder-for-hire plot.
At this point, the jury has probably either already made up their minds based on the evidence, or the closing arguments will be what ultimately swings it. It really comes down to who they believe. Do they believe the admitted murderers who have given inconsistent stories and have every incentive to say whatever helps them get out of jail? Or do they believe the defense’s argument that Durk is being treated like the person in charge simply because he’s the biggest and most famous name involved?
Being the most famous guy in the room doesn’t automatically make you the boss or the mastermind.
The defense did an okay job creating doubt, but in closing they really need to make the case explicitly that Vonnie was the mastermind and the person actually directing the plot.
In reality, Durk probably knew something about what was going on. The real question is whether the prosecution has actually proven that he ordered it. Everyone involved is tied up in gangs and violence, so the credibility of the witnesses is a huge part of the case.
Honestly, it could go either way. Odds are he’s cooked, but they still haven’t explicitly proven that Durk actually ordered the murder-for-hire plot.
At this point, the jury has probably either already made up their minds based on the evidence, or the closing arguments will be what ultimately swings it. It really comes down to who they believe. Do they believe the admitted murderers who have given inconsistent stories and have every incentive to say whatever helps them get out of jail? Or do they believe the defense’s argument that Durk is being treated like the person in charge simply because he’s the biggest and most famous name involved?
Being the most famous guy in the room doesn’t automatically make you the boss or the mastermind.
The defense did an okay job creating doubt, but in closing they really need to make the case explicitly that Vonnie was the mastermind and the person actually directing the plot.
In reality, Durk probably knew something about what was going on. The real question is whether the prosecution has actually proven that he ordered it. Everyone involved is tied up in gangs and violence, so the credibility of the witnesses is a huge part of the case.
To add, I actually find the argument that Vonnie was behind it pretty compelling. He comes across like a master manipulator, so it’s possible he could have convinced people to do the shooting by making them believe the order came from Durk.
His testimony about knowing the BMW had a tracker is also strange. If he knew it was being tracked, why would he bring it along on a hit in the first place? It almost sounds like he was building himself a layer of protection in case they got caught, so he could later distance himself from what happened.
Planting these seeds is what will win him the case.
To add, I actually find the argument that Vonnie was behind it pretty compelling. He comes across like a master manipulator, so it’s possible he could have convinced people to do the shooting by making them believe the order came from Durk.
His testimony about knowing the BMW had a tracker is also strange. If he knew it was being tracked, why would he bring it along on a hit in the first place? It almost sounds like he was building himself a layer of protection in case they got caught, so he could later distance himself from what happened.
Planting these seeds is what will win him the case.
Nigga what Jam and them niggas don’t even respect Vonnie
Durk had a nice career man. Talk about a second revival.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
The best case scenario and hope I see for Durk is if they get a mistrial because Vonnie was so arrogant, he cloned Durk’s card, and he was still moving like he had money when he was supposed to be broke. Otherwise it’s over my boy and then he still got another case to fight
I saw that. He also said Cardi was a Cia asset for shaking her ass
If you rearrange the letters in Cardi B you get Fauci Lied
Honestly, it could go either way. Odds are he’s cooked, but they still haven’t explicitly proven that Durk actually ordered the murder-for-hire plot.
At this point, the jury has probably either already made up their minds based on the evidence, or the closing arguments will be what ultimately swings it. It really comes down to who they believe. Do they believe the admitted murderers who have given inconsistent stories and have every incentive to say whatever helps them get out of jail? Or do they believe the defense’s argument that Durk is being treated like the person in charge simply because he’s the biggest and most famous name involved?
Being the most famous guy in the room doesn’t automatically make you the boss or the mastermind.
The defense did an okay job creating doubt, but in closing they really need to make the case explicitly that Vonnie was the mastermind and the person actually directing the plot.
In reality, Durk probably knew something about what was going on. The real question is whether the prosecution has actually proven that he ordered it. Everyone involved is tied up in gangs and violence, so the credibility of the witnesses is a huge part of the case.
idk how it all works really, but if the burden is beyond a reasonable doubt, and it comes down to beliving randoms who have a motive to lie and frame durk (even if thats the less likely situation), then that IS reasonable doubt. I dont think you should put someone away for life, off of essentially the vibes of a witness
Nigga what Jam and them niggas don’t even respect Vonnie
Key word is manipulation. They thought all the instructions came from Smurk. In reality it didn’t but the defense can create enough reasonable doubt. Saying you think Vonnie is a goofy doesn’t mean it’s not possible.
idk how it all works really, but if the burden is beyond a reasonable doubt, and it comes down to beliving randoms who have a motive to lie and frame durk (even if thats the less likely situation), then that IS reasonable doubt. I dont think you should put someone away for life, off of essentially the vibes of a witness
Exactly. That’s why it’s important to have a jury of your peers. Sadly as a community we don’t go to summons for fear of “snitching” etc
Exactly. That’s why it’s important to have a jury of your peers. Sadly as a community we don’t go to summons for fear of “snitching” etc
So you just want a juror of biased durk fans to say he’s innocent lmao
Like dawg durk got no one else to blame but himself for all those leaked text messages and the burner calls and the blatant proof.
Threads like this make me glad none of yall got law degrees besides @Silas cause that motherfucker be on it. Lot of yall turn yall logic brain off and turn your stan brain on and that’s not how the real world works.
saw a vid where Durk name checks jam like 76 times in songs, niggas gotta cut that out now lol
idk how it all works really, but if the burden is beyond a reasonable doubt, and it comes down to beliving randoms who have a motive to lie and frame durk (even if thats the less likely situation), then that IS reasonable doubt. I dont think you should put someone away for life, off of essentially the vibes of a witness
the man booked 3 flights an hour after everyone got arrested and got arrested at the airport otw to a private flight
thats before we even get to the long list of other stupid bullshit he did. It’s a wrap
the man booked 3 flights an hour after everyone got arrested and got arrested at the airport otw to a private flight
thats before we even get to the long list of other stupid bullshit he did. It’s a wrap
oh its probably a wrap, but i just personally think there’s reasonable doubt.
booking a flight out of a country because you’re accused of a crime doesnt prove your guilty. but its a bad look.
the text where hes like i got u all this stuff and you all arent doing anything, i think is the biggest piece of evidence. but idk beyond a shadow of a doubt it was referring to thsi specific situation?
in my judgement, theres a shadow of a doubt. if youre putting somebody away for LIFE you need irrefutable, damning evidence.
even though he most likely did that s***, I think putting someone away for life off the testimony of shifty characters who have a motive against you, should not be the bar
coudl be more evidence im not reading about tho im not following too it closely
i dont listen to durks music or anything im not a fan like that. Im just following random s*** im seeing itt
oh its probably a wrap, but i just personally think there’s reasonable doubt.
booking a flight out of a country because you’re accused of a crime doesnt prove your guilty. but its a bad look.
the text where hes like i got u all this stuff and you all arent doing anything, i think is the biggest piece of evidence. but idk beyond a shadow of a doubt it was referring to thsi specific situation?
in my judgement, theres a shadow of a doubt. if youre putting somebody away for LIFE you need irrefutable, damning evidence.
even though he most likely did that s***, I think putting someone away for life off the testimony of shifty characters who have a motive against you, should not be the bar
coudl be more evidence im not reading about tho im not following too it closely
there is no motive against the nigga
he hired hitmen then didn’t pay them
wrap this s*** up. just sounds like a terrible kingpin
Like dawg durk got no one else to blame but himself for all those leaked text messages and the burner calls and the blatant proof.
Threads like this make me glad none of yall got law degrees besides @Silas cause that motherfucker be on it. Lot of yall turn yall logic brain off and turn your stan brain on and that’s not how the real world works.
He’s just copying and pasting tweets he doesn’t credit lol
He’s just copying and pasting tweets he doesn’t credit lol
Moreso the quickness I know he aint an indepedent source lol