dumbass americans will see the huge discrepancy in murders per capita next to every other first world nation on the planet and still want they strap cause they fragile ego needs the fantasy of gunning a man down in cold blood just to hold onto they self esteem
whole nation full of pussies
I love how this is a blanket statement lol
I think the more relevant issue is why women end up murdered by their ex lovers and their bodies are never found
this isn’t even just an American problem, this s*** is happening all over the globe, there are more than 78,000 missing people in Mexico but go off little one
Idk why people ignoring this post . Honestly the disturbed look on his face I think he was about to do something super f***ed up. He ain't even look like he was angry s*** was kind of creepy .
Shooting him seems overboard but if I lived in America and someone disturbed was tryna break in then yea I would be worried they were armed idk if that was the fear here
because it goes against everything they’re trying to argue
dumbass americans will see the huge discrepancy in murders per capita next to every other first world nation on the planet and still want they strap cause they fragile ego needs the fantasy of gunning a man down in cold blood just to hold onto they self esteem
whole nation full of pussies
Iirc like half the countries in africa have a lower murder rate than america as well lmao
Iirc like half the countries in africa have a lower murder rate than america as well lmao
dont tell the americucks this itll break they f***ing minds in half
because it goes against everything they’re trying to argue
We have literally had a college kid ktt member who got shot up in a random home invasion before . I always remember that
And as u say this was an ex situation she knew him well and was afraid he was gonna kill her I definitely think we should at least trust her on that and that her father believed her in that moment
We have literally had a college kid ktt member who got shot up in a random home invasion before . I always remember that
And as u say this was an ex situation she knew him well and was afraid he was gonna kill her I definitely think we should at least trust her on that and that her father believed her in that moment
that’s what did it for me.. as soon as he heard her say that is when he started shooting
I can almost forgive a lot of the takes itt because they keep ignoring this fact
it’s one thing to just rattle off takes to the video in OP but once you learn more information it’s even more justified
Idk why ya keep saying "fantasy" "fanfic" as a response to people saying he could of had a gun on him. This is america, that's a very realistic scenario/possiblity lol
Idk why ya keep saying "fantasy" "fanfic" as a response to people saying he could of had a gun on him. This is america, that's a very realistic scenario/possiblity lol
and they’re the same ones saying how America has a gun problem
like it’s out of the realm of possibility to assume the nigga at the door is strapped
Idk why ya keep saying "fantasy" "fanfic" as a response to people saying he could of had a gun on him. This is america, that's a very realistic scenario/possiblity lol
As a non American you don't really think about stuff like this. At least I don't.
But yeah, you're right.
America wild
Bruh i went away to write a whole ass report for work and i come back and yall still arguin. Let it rest
https://www.noordhaghe.nl/wapenhandel-webshop/vuurwapens/glock/3836/glock43xmos9x19mm.html
Den Haag.
Local gunshop of Mark Rutte
AIVD in this thread now.
Please know I don't have any plans to buy a gun
they also got a shooting range super close to me but if i ever go on there ill be added to a list im sure
if im not already on that list
they also got a shooting range super close to me but if i ever go on there ill be added to a list im sure
if im not already on that list
You Dutch as well?
those are not separate arguments....
you can't say this event doesn't fall under the mindset because it also falls under castle doctrine. the other guy said it's not part of the larger problem (the mindset) and that it is instead castle doctrine.
these are not mutually exclusive, everything I am saying is coherent and logically follows
no
1st u said that save me some d***z was sayin that judge judy juror societal problem is not a real problem bc castle doctrine, and u thought that was wrong. what u misread was that save me never commented on judge jury ugh being or not being a problem in a general sense, though you thought he did. that's why replied to me in dis kinda fashion
i'm fairly confident i can effectively substantiate the argument that the existence of a law does not mean something is or isn't a problem in society . . .
or y u replied to save me d***z like
my only point ever (
) was that making an argument for a social concept being a problem or not based on a law existing is not good !
blonded argument #2 is sayin that save me from this debate was saying that because this situation is castle crashers, it is therefore not jury execution, and you think that is wrong.
one has to do with the existence of judge jury executioner being a problem at all, the second has to do with whether or not it has a mutually exclusive relationship with the castle doctrine. the second literally presumes that the first argument is already resolved, because for something to even have (or not have) a mutually exclusive relationship with anything, it has to exist and be a thing.
they're different
pagga gang
Lol yall be typing whole ass essays on the morality of life and ethical integrity... idc if tha nigga breaking in got three kids and a mortgage Im goin out like alec baldwin 💯
no
1st u said that save me some d***z was sayin that judge judy juror societal problem is not a real problem bc castle doctrine, and u thought that was wrong. what u misread was that save me never commented on judge jury ugh being or not being a problem in a general sense, though you thought he did. that's why replied to me in dis kinda fashion
i'm fairly confident i can effectively substantiate the argument that the existence of a law does not mean something is or isn't a problem in society . . .
or y u replied to save me d***z like
my only point ever (
) was that making an argument for a social concept being a problem or not based on a law existing is not good !
blonded argument #2 is sayin that save me from this debate was saying that because this situation is castle crashers, it is therefore not jury execution, and you think that is wrong.
one has to do with the existence of judge jury executioner being a problem at all, the second has to do with whether or not it has a mutually exclusive relationship with the castle doctrine. the second literally presumes that the first argument is already resolved, because for something to even have (or not have) a mutually exclusive relationship with anything, it has to exist and be a thing.
they're different
show me where i said that he didn't believe it was a real problem
jeeeesus christ dawg im done anywho i will say and this can either be a good thing or a bad thing idk how you'd interpret it but there are truly only a few users who i think would evr be brazy enough to entertain that bullshit for so long, so i do think that's kinda hilarious in a positive way
Lol yall be typing whole ass essays on the morality of life and ethical integrity... idc if tha nigga breaking in got three kids and a mortgage Im goin out like alec baldwin 💯
