I've been a drunken s***head countless times and if I broke down my neighbor's door and they shot me I'd be like "damn that was taking it kinda far, but I can't blame you I guess"
Its not like it was an angry or drunk boyfriend. It was her ex. For all we know, they could've cut all ties and he was just like any other dude on the street. Obviously she's still gonna say don't shoot cause she doesn't wanna see someone she used to date die. But the dad still had every right.
and the people who are on the opposite position would say the mindset does apply and is part of the reason this ended up in death... but saying lol castle doctrine doesn't advance any argument because it doesn't actually mean anything
who cares dawg they're wrong
the judge jury executioner thing has an actual situational meaning when it's being used as a criticism. n that wasn't exemplified here cus the phrase/criticism is not just a blanket buzzword for "anyone who kills another person".
who cares dawg they're wrong
the judge jury executioner thing has an actual situational meaning when it's being used as a criticism. n that wasn't exemplified here cus the phrase/criticism is not just a blanket buzzword for "anyone who kills another person".
right lol and he said the castle doctrine doesn’t mean anything
I swear I’ve never been more in awe of stupidity than I have been since I’ve been in this thread
right lol and he said the castle doctrine doesn’t mean anything
I swear I’ve never been more in awe of stupidity than I have been since I’ve been in this thread
i said the castle doctrine has no relevance to the proof of a concept
not that the castle doctrine isn't relevant in the situation. i never said this situation wasn't castle doctrine or that the father isn't protected
you literally cannot f***ing read
how should he have handled this then?
what if he loses the fight? that’s not something you gamble on, he shouldn’t have even been in this situation to begin with.
i said the castle doctrine has no relevance to the proof of a concept
not that the castle doctrine isn't relevant in the situation. i never said this situation wasn't castle doctrine or that the father isn't protected
you literally cannot f***ing read
neither does the judge jury and executioner bullshit you tried to bring up you nunce
neither does the judge jury and executioner bullshit you tried to bring up you nunce
i brought that up because you cited castle doctrine as the reasoning for judge jury executioner not being a cultural problem
i'm glad we can finally come full circle
i brought that up because you cited castle doctrine as the reasoning for judge jury executioner not being a cultural problem
i'm glad we can finally come full circle
man once again here we are
you still missed the entire point I made lol
who cares dawg they're wrong
the judge jury executioner thing has an actual situational meaning when it's being used as a criticism. n that wasn't exemplified here cus the phrase/criticism is not just a blanket buzzword for "anyone who kills another person".
ay bro if you all want to waste your time arguing online but not actually making substantive arguments go for it
ay bro if you all want to waste your time arguing online but not actually making substantive arguments go for it
the projection
man once again here we are
you still missed the entire point I made lol
i have more faith in you being the incorrect one here since you went on a multi-post tirade fabricating positions and arguments i never took
so he should have gambled with his and his daughters life by just choosing to fight him, without even knowing if he was armed, makes sense
and god forbid the father loses the fight and then him and his daughter are dead
please don’t ever vote or serve on a jury if you even think what happened wasn’t warranted