nothing is a fantasy about that dumb nigga
the f*** was he there for? did you even read what this was about, a lot of y’all caping for a criminal itt and it’s hilarious
did you not see me call him a petty criminal?
Try and expand your pea brain and stop thinking like a caveman where u think execution is the answer to the slightest provocation
The point me and others are making here is about a larger cultural rot/system not about anyone person
You understand this is the same s*** that leads to a murder of an ahmad aubery or a trayvon martin? You cant have it both ways my guy
In other civilized countries regular ass people dont have the ability to instantly become judge, jury and executioner without that trigger of their life being in explicit danger being reached
did you not see me call him a petty criminal?
Try and expand your pea brain and stop thinking like a caveman where u think execution is the answer to the slightest provocation
The point me and others are making here is about a larger cultural rot/system not about anyone person
You understand this is the same s*** that leads to a murder of an ahmad aubery or a trayvon martin? You cant have it both ways my guy
In other civilized countries regular ass people dont have the ability to instantly become judge, jury and executioner without that trigger of their life being in explicit danger being reached
my guy, cut the bullshit out
this is not a larger problem, this is a clear cut example of the castle doctrine
do you know what that is?
you have the right to protect your family and your property, what should the father have done? please explain since I’m just an idiot according to you
let me know what to do to protect my daughter in this situation from an unhinged individual breaking down my door, appreciate you
A castle doctrine, also known as a castle law or a defense of habitation law, is a legal doctrine that designates a person's abode or any legally occupied place (for example, a vehicle or home) as a place in which that person has protections and immunities permitting one, in certain circumstances, to use force (up to and including deadly force) to defend oneself against an intruder, free from legal prosecution for the consequences of the force used.
Learn the law before calling someone a pea brain.
nothing is a fantasy about that dumb nigga
the f*** was he there for? did you even read what this was about, a lot of y’all caping for a criminal itt and it’s hilarious
Bro I’m so lost
Buddy is freaking out tryna take the door down at his ex girlfriend’s house, possibly on d****, could be armed
I can’t condemn anybody for tryna protect their daughter in a world where so many women get killed by their abusers, because I can’t even imagine what I would do
this is a cultural problem.
Americans see no problem as being judge, jury and executioner, as Brad Pitt so eloquently put it.
it is an innate bias, we have become accustomed to always being around guns that we have no problem killing.
was he right to try to break into his house?
f*** no
did the father have a right to kill this man?
according to the US, yes.
should someone have been killed?
nah.
all in all both are in the wrong.
my guy, cut the bullshit out
this is not a larger problem, this is a clear cut example of the castle doctrine
do you know what that is?
you have the right to protect your family and your property, what should the father have done? please explain since I’m just an idiot according to you
let me know what to do to protect my daughter in this situation from an unhinged individual breaking down my door, appreciate you
Idk calling the police?
The kid was clearly unarmed and thinking extremely stupidly
Also it seems they knew him as well since he was an ex.
There was no explicit intent of serious physical harm.
Bro I’m so lost
Buddy is freaking out tryna take the door down at his ex girlfriend’s house, possibly on d****, could be armed
I can’t condemn anybody for tryna protect their daughter in a world where so many women get killed by their abusers, because I can’t even imagine what I would do
right man wtf
the problem I see is a lot of women are missing and dead in this country
but god forbid you protect your daughter from her psychotic ex boyfriend that is actively breaking down your front door in front of a ring camera
actions have consequences, don’t ever mess with a man’s daughter, he was well within his right to use deadly force, the grand jury didn’t even choose to indict him because the exes actions were just that egregious
I can’t believe this isn’t common sense man, it’s a shame that I even have to point all of this out
right man wtf
the problem I see is a lot of women are missing and dead in this country
but god forbid you protect your daughter from her psychotic ex boyfriend that is actively breaking down your front door in front of a ring camera
actions have consequences, don’t ever mess with a man’s daughter, he was well within his right to use deadly force, the grand jury didn’t even choose to indict him because the exes actions were just that egregious
I can’t believe this isn’t common sense man, it’s a shame that I even have to point all of this out
nobody is saying he wont protect his daughter
were just saying it doesnt have to come down to a death.
Idk calling the police?
The kid was clearly unarmed and thinking extremely stupidly
Also it seems they knew him as well since he was an ex.
There was no explicit intent of serious physical harm.
HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE POLICE TO RESPOND TO A SITUATION?
man use your brain for a second, so what happens when this dude is in your house, possibly under the influence, charging after your daughter?!
stop pretending to be holier than thou
man, and i love aaliyah's music.
a dumbass had to be a fan of her.
!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HSJU5fDg0A&ab_channel=BlackgroundRecords2.0ashamed to be a fan of anything you enjoy, you’re basically implying that it’s cool for her ex to break down the door and possibly harm his daughter
f***ing idiot
Idk calling the police?
The kid was clearly unarmed and thinking extremely stupidly
Also it seems they knew him as well since he was an ex.
There was no explicit intent of serious physical harm.
"Calling the police"
How long will the police take lol
"Clearly unarmed"
You're saying this cause you saw the video not from the perspective of being behind the door.
"There was no explicit intent of serious physical harm"
How would they know that, he's an EX tryna knock down the door, not like he was there for a friendly chat lol
right man wtf
the problem I see is a lot of women are missing and dead in this country
but god forbid you protect your daughter from her psychotic ex boyfriend that is actively breaking down your front door in front of a ring camera
actions have consequences, don’t ever mess with a man’s daughter, he was well within his right to use deadly force, the grand jury didn’t even choose to indict him because the exes actions were just that egregious
I can’t believe this isn’t common sense man, it’s a shame that I even have to point all of this out
I don’t have a daughter, so I don’t how I’d act. But I do know that I and 99% of people’s brain would be in fight or flight mode, including the people performing itt
especially in a situation where we can clearly see this man acting unhinged and violent
i’ll leave it at that
saw sby say “The fam prob knew him bc he’s an ex” like thats a point. Like abusive people don’t hide who they are, or that sometimes crazy doesn’t come out until later.
it’s all so naive
They’re acting like he showed up in a sweater asking if he could just talk to her
They’re acting like he showed up in a sweater asking if he could just talk to her
some of the dumbest s*** I’ve ever read on the internet
man was willing to risk his life over gettin in that house n dawg thinks bro was just gon steal some gum off the counter
Thread is a clash bw Americans and non-americans perspective
nobody has answered what the father should have done, i genuinely want to understand what they would have done in Canada or some s***ty country that doesn’t allow you to protect your family from imminent harm
A castle doctrine, also known as a castle law or a defense of habitation law, is a legal doctrine that designates a person's abode or any legally occupied place (for example, a vehicle or home) as a place in which that person has protections and immunities permitting one, in certain circumstances, to use force (up to and including deadly force) to defend oneself against an intruder, free from legal prosecution for the consequences of the force used.
Learn the law before calling someone a pea brain.
it was legal to f*** kids in ye olden days i'd rather not appeal to it as the final authority