Sep 8, 2022·1 reply
Galaxy de list monDanny really couldve better streamlined Atrocity Exhibition to possibly be on the level of XXX but 4 or 5 lesser songs on a 15 song album is enough for me to consider it a step below the classic label that many give it. The highs are insane though. Similar to Yeezus in my view on it, I suppose
Golddust, Pnuemonia, From the Ground, and Hell for It?
- Sep 8, 2022·2 repliesinternet buddy
Golddust, Pnuemonia, From the Ground, and Hell for It?
Golddust
Dance in the Water
From the Ground
Get Hi - Sep 8, 2022
Hell For It is slightly less quality than the best stuff but is a good closer
- Sep 8, 2022·1 replyGalaxy de list mon
Golddust
Dance in the Water
From the Ground
Get HiYou tripping with half this list
- Sep 8, 2022internet buddy
You tripping with half this list
Nahh m8
Sep 8, 2022Galaxy de list monGolddust
Dance in the Water
From the Ground
Get HiDance in the Water is absolutely insane
People hate on From the Ground but it provides a pacing switch up and Kelela kills it
AE is only like 46 minutes long anyway, the only track I'd actually cut is Get Hi
- Sep 8, 2022·edited·3 replies
10 reasons I think re-doing the 2010s list is viable and the most re-doable list.
1. Would be updated to the current voting block we've had since the 90s (at least 4 new voters) (would remove one time voters who did not respond to my subsequent invites).
2. Original 2010s list was made as soon as the decade finished so a year like 2019, or even 2018 and 2017 may not have had enough time to be fully digested.
3. Original list was strictly 50 albums per voter. Increasing it to 70 would probably increase the number of albums on the list.
4. It is the most likely decade where people's lists may have had somewhat drastic changes since it is the most recent.
5. People who do not want to make a new list can just use their old list/make minor changes/add 20 albums for new maximum (or not), and would be way less stressful for everyone involved.
6. I am bored.
7. I like making layouts.
8. I am de list mon
9. ok i only have 5 real reasons and 3 pointless ones
10. f*** you
edit. 11. believe it or not, 2023 will mark 3 years since that original list was made, which is normal REDUX length between lists
Sep 8, 2022·1 replyGalaxy de list mon· edited10 reasons I think re-doing the 2010s list is viable and the most re-doable list.
1. Would be updated to the current voting block we've had since the 90s (at least 4 new voters) (would remove one time voters who did not respond to my subsequent invites).
2. Original 2010s list was made as soon as the decade finished so a year like 2019, or even 2018 and 2017 may not have had enough time to be fully digested.
3. Original list was strictly 50 albums per voter. Increasing it to 70 would probably increase the number of albums on the list.
4. It is the most likely decade where people's lists may have had somewhat drastic changes since it is the most recent.
5. People who do not want to make a new list can just use their old list/make minor changes/add 20 albums for new maximum (or not), and would be way less stressful for everyone involved.
6. I am bored.
7. I like making layouts.
8. I am de list mon
9. ok i only have 5 real reasons and 3 pointless ones
10. f*** you
edit. 11. believe it or not, 2023 will mark 3 years since that original list was made, which is normal REDUX length between lists Make a 2010s list as well got it
- Sep 8, 2022·1 replyrise zero
Make a 2010s list as well got it
work on your 60s list first, we will worry about potential 2010s re-do after.
- Sep 8, 2022·1 replyGalaxy de list mon
work on your 60s list first, we will worry about potential 2010s re-do after.
Too late already writing it as we speak
- Sep 8, 2022Galaxy de list mon· edited
10 reasons I think re-doing the 2010s list is viable and the most re-doable list.
1. Would be updated to the current voting block we've had since the 90s (at least 4 new voters) (would remove one time voters who did not respond to my subsequent invites).
2. Original 2010s list was made as soon as the decade finished so a year like 2019, or even 2018 and 2017 may not have had enough time to be fully digested.
3. Original list was strictly 50 albums per voter. Increasing it to 70 would probably increase the number of albums on the list.
4. It is the most likely decade where people's lists may have had somewhat drastic changes since it is the most recent.
5. People who do not want to make a new list can just use their old list/make minor changes/add 20 albums for new maximum (or not), and would be way less stressful for everyone involved.
6. I am bored.
7. I like making layouts.
8. I am de list mon
9. ok i only have 5 real reasons and 3 pointless ones
10. f*** you
edit. 11. believe it or not, 2023 will mark 3 years since that original list was made, which is normal REDUX length between lists downsides
1. would probably still look pretty similar to old listt. - Sep 8, 2022rise zero
Too late already writing it as we speak
- Sep 8, 2022·1 reply
XXX is Danny's best. It's somehow funnier and sadder at the same time. He presents himself as one of the best of his generation on that project, absolutely wild s***. Pac Blood? Party All the Time? DNA? Nobody touching that. The production on AE is better but Danny is more gripping on XXX.
- Sep 8, 2022Noir
XXX is Danny's best. It's somehow funnier and sadder at the same time. He presents himself as one of the best of his generation on that project, absolutely wild s***. Pac Blood? Party All the Time? DNA? Nobody touching that. The production on AE is better but Danny is more gripping on XXX.
absolutely.
Sep 8, 2022·1 replyGalaxy de list mon10 reasons I think re-doing the 2010s list is viable and the most re-doable list.
1. Would be updated to the current voting block we've had since the 90s (at least 4 new voters) (would remove one time voters who did not respond to my subsequent invites).
2. Original 2010s list was made as soon as the decade finished so a year like 2019, or even 2018 and 2017 may not have had enough time to be fully digested.
3. Original list was strictly 50 albums per voter. Increasing it to 70 would probably increase the number of albums on the list.
4. It is the most likely decade where people's lists may have had somewhat drastic changes since it is the most recent.
5. People who do not want to make a new list can just use their old list/make minor changes/add 20 albums for new maximum (or not), and would be way less stressful for everyone involved.
6. I am bored.
7. I like making layouts.
8. I am de list mon
9. ok i only have 5 real reasons and 3 pointless ones
10. f*** you
edit. 11. believe it or not, 2023 will mark 3 years since that original list was made, which is normal REDUX length between lists Man just come up with a new theme for the love of god
or split the decades like rvi suggested- Sep 8, 2022·2 repliesElric
Man just come up with a new theme for the love of god
or split the decades like rvi suggestedhey man I'm just theorizing bro
and at this point, after having done 6 full decades in 3 years, what decade would I split??? I'm not touching the goddamn 50s. And what other 'theme' would I do? Albums is the easiest to make lists on and I aint doing film lists. Song lists are nearly impossible for most people. You making no sense. - Sep 8, 2022·2 replies
new theme
- Sep 8, 2022·1 reply
I don't have a problem with another 2010s list because I've rediscovered and listened to a lot of new stuff since the last time
- Sep 8, 2022Galaxy de list mon
hey man I'm just theorizing bro
and at this point, after having done 6 full decades in 3 years, what decade would I split??? I'm not touching the goddamn 50s. And what other 'theme' would I do? Albums is the easiest to make lists on and I aint doing film lists. Song lists are nearly impossible for most people. You making no sense.
- Sep 8, 2022·2 repliesGalaxy de list mon
new theme
New f***in topic, Sasquatchewan
- Sep 8, 2022rise zero
I don't have a problem with another 2010s list because I've rediscovered and listened to a lot of new stuff since the last time
yea, it's the only list that really makes sense to re-do. 5 people who voted for the original are no longer around or only voted on that one, would be replaced with the 4 people who have been voting with us since the 90s who didn't vote on this one, plus most people will more than likely have a different list than other decades (plus more votes per person). I didn't think it was a bad idea.
- Sep 8, 2022Elric
New f***in topic, Sasquatchewan
Best albums/movies/games of the decade all in one list
- Sep 8, 2022
Subnautica vs The Master vs Yeezus
- Sep 8, 2022·1 replyElric
New f***in topic, Sasquatchewan
I know what you meant. What do you propose?
And it's not like you ever liked these decade lists anyways. I'm pulling half of your lists from the grave because you've spent 30 years marinating a single half-decade. If I re-do the 2010s just know I can just use your old list again and you wouldn't have to worry about it.
- Sep 8, 2022
forget all that s*** anyways. work on your 60s lists. that's the important one right now.