★ FAM 2 ★

Page 2467 of 5344
Reply
  • Mar 2, 2022
    Koala

    I was waiting for you to mention Elden how you diggin it ? Is it too fantasy for me or more like a DS3 vibe ?

    Nah you'll dig it, it's pretty much Dark Souls 4

  • Mar 2, 2022
    ·
    2 replies

    @drjdeponytail tell these fools about Aladdin Sane

  • rvi 🐦‍⬛
    Mar 2, 2022
    ·
    2 replies

    i think people sometimes overstate the "togetherness" of the individual decades, if that makes sense

    acting like 1980 and 1979 belong more with their respective "decades" than with each other

    also kinda ties back to the idea that people have a set year in mind too prominently anyway when listening to music and it should just go beyond worrying if something "sounds like 1966" or is "timeless" but i realize that is a totally useless discussion and people will always utilize the calendar to describe a lot of these things

  • Mar 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    rvi

    i think people sometimes overstate the "togetherness" of the individual decades, if that makes sense

    acting like 1980 and 1979 belong more with their respective "decades" than with each other

    also kinda ties back to the idea that people have a set year in mind too prominently anyway when listening to music and it should just go beyond worrying if something "sounds like 1966" or is "timeless" but i realize that is a totally useless discussion and people will always utilize the calendar to describe a lot of these things

    Personally all this s*** made alot more sense once I knew exactly when everything came out

  • Mar 2, 2022
    Elric

    @drjdeponytail tell these fools about Aladdin Sane

    Was listening to Transformer earlier and Ronson was truly a beast, underrated tbh

  • Mar 2, 2022
    rvi

    i think people sometimes overstate the "togetherness" of the individual decades, if that makes sense

    acting like 1980 and 1979 belong more with their respective "decades" than with each other

    also kinda ties back to the idea that people have a set year in mind too prominently anyway when listening to music and it should just go beyond worrying if something "sounds like 1966" or is "timeless" but i realize that is a totally useless discussion and people will always utilize the calendar to describe a lot of these things

    This is only a recent phenomenon in reality. Before about the 19th century nobody ever really distinguished time in this way. There wasn’t really a perspective on past and future but more so a continuation of the present. The constant shifts in culture and technology in the last couple hundred years has made these distinctions more prominent and I think breaking time down by decades while flawed tends to work well enough.

  • rvi 🐦‍⬛
    Mar 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Elric

    Personally all this s*** made alot more sense once I knew exactly when everything came out

    same but then there is just a point where sometimes its good to take a step back. after all it is something nonmusical that can unintentionally pollute thoughts of the music. its cool if something seeming "ahead of their time" makes it more interesting but potentially unfair if something amazing can just get cast aside because it was released a few years too late

    and yes this is convo is too nerdy anyway

  • Mar 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    rvi

    same but then there is just a point where sometimes its good to take a step back. after all it is something nonmusical that can unintentionally pollute thoughts of the music. its cool if something seeming "ahead of their time" makes it more interesting but potentially unfair if something amazing can just get cast aside because it was released a few years too late

    and yes this is convo is too nerdy anyway

    I don't recall ever casting something aside just for being derivative usually enjoy picking out the influences

  • rvi 🐦‍⬛
    Mar 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Elric

    I don't recall ever casting something aside just for being derivative usually enjoy picking out the influences

    same here but some people definitely do i feel like. not itt, just in general, probably some critics

    innovation is great but some can take it a step too far and disregard (building on) tradition which is bad imo especially considering how important it is for some forms of music

    but ofc it can be lame if something is just a direct copy or something though years later

  • Mar 2, 2022
    ·
    2 replies
    rvi

    same here but some people definitely do i feel like. not itt, just in general, probably some critics

    innovation is great but some can take it a step too far and disregard (building on) tradition which is bad imo especially considering how important it is for some forms of music

    but ofc it can be lame if something is just a direct copy or something though years later

    Critics hated early Zeppelin cause they were “derivative”

  • rvi 🐦‍⬛
    Mar 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply

    there are definitely different levels to it. someone who blends influences in a novel way, someone who doesnt invent much but still pays respect to the tradition and does it in a valuable way, or someone who might as well just be a lukewarm cover artist with no identity

  • rvi 🐦‍⬛
    Mar 2, 2022
    internet buddy

    Critics hated early Zeppelin cause they were “derivative”

    link on that being the reason? i bet they were just disregarding any blues based music as looking too much into the past

    good example of obviously taking influences from something but inarguably making something new out of it. despite a few dumbasses who probably claim that they werent originals at all. ofc the uncredited covers/occasional plagiarism thing complicates it as well as people not understanding the blues tradition but its not like songwriting was their major contribution to music

  • Mar 2, 2022
    ·
    edited

    Hail Caesar ends a little too abruptly. Could have watched another hour in that world. Still what is there is like 4 star material.

  • Mar 2, 2022
    ·
    2 replies
    internet buddy

    Critics hated early Zeppelin cause they were “derivative”

    Revisited all zep at work the other day and I probably would've been a hater of the first two tbh

  • Mar 2, 2022
    Fella

    I will when I’m done with the movie

    Cataclysmic

  • rvi 🐦‍⬛
    Mar 2, 2022
    ·
    2 replies
    Elric

    Revisited all zep at work the other day and I probably would've been a hater of the first two tbh

    as if they even sound that different from the rest especially II which was the real crystallization of the sound

  • Mar 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Elric

    Revisited all zep at work the other day and I probably would've been a hater of the first two tbh

    First one is above average but the second is a slog. Lemon Song

  • Mar 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    rvi

    as if they even sound that different from the rest especially II which was the real crystallization of the sound

    3 and Houses are very different

  • Mar 2, 2022
    ·
    2 replies
    internet buddy

    First one is above average but the second is a slog. Lemon Song

    They are kind of egregious too because they were ripping off blues standards without giving them the songwriting credit

  • Mar 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    internet buddy

    3 and Houses are very different

    They were their own thing by then

  • Mar 2, 2022
    Elric

    They are kind of egregious too because they were ripping off blues standards without giving them the songwriting credit

    I remember an iTunes review of Zep 1 said it was a Willie Dixon cover album

  • rvi 🐦‍⬛
    Mar 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Elric

    They are kind of egregious too because they were ripping off blues standards without giving them the songwriting credit

    this would hit me differently if it was another genre besides the ones where half the standards were ripped off other ones anyway

  • rvi 🐦‍⬛
    Mar 2, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Elric

    They were their own thing by then

    they were their own thing with I and that is their most significant album, and you know i can be a slight detractor of them sometimes lowkey one of the more important albums in rock history ngl

  • Mar 2, 2022
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    rvi

    this would hit me differently if it was another genre besides the ones where half the standards were ripped off other ones anyway

    Yeah but how many of the British Invasion bands were doing slight rewrites to avoid giving up songwriting? Can't think of many

    Also iirc they are still in court over Stairway intro which they might as well throw Spirit a frickin bone at this point cause i doubt they're living the cozy rockstar retirements they deserve

  • Mar 2, 2022
    rvi

    they were their own thing with I and that is their most significant album, and you know i can be a slight detractor of them sometimes lowkey one of the more important albums in rock history ngl

    Yeah I know but personally Thank You the first interesting thing they did :elon: