Does he even have an end goal? Nuking his career when he doesn’t care anymore is one thing, but what does he even gain from winning
Does he even have an end goal? Nuking his career when he doesn’t care anymore is one thing, but what does he even gain from winning
Some hair
First it is “he’s suing UMG wow how corny and not Kendrick for calling him a pedo”
Now it is b**** made to these same Kendrick shills he sues for being called a pedo to the world
The hatred runs deeps and it is true delusion from these people
Almost like he asked to be called a pedo
Does he even have an end goal? Nuking his career when he doesn’t care anymore is one thing, but what does he even gain from winning
He's not winning
First it is “he’s suing UMG wow how corny and not Kendrick for calling him a pedo”
Now it is b**** made to these same Kendrick shills he sues for being called a pedo to the world
The hatred runs deeps and it is true delusion from these people
Both sides are b**** made, feel free to reach out if you’d like me to expand!
They're gonna play not like us in court lmfao
"my client is not in fact a certified pdf. Which certification board would even certify such a statement?"
Ngl the beef was fun I still liked both but this makes me fr dislike Drake. Take your L you f***in lame
https://twitter.com/phil_lewis_/status/1861457859990393156Nah fr this is worse than apologizing.
Ihe woulde ben better off runnin a fade with kendrick
Does he even have an end goal? Nuking his career when he doesn’t care anymore is one thing, but what does he even gain from winning
"the source told The Independent, if Drake is successful at tamping down wrongdoing throughout the industry, the result could help protect other, less well-known artists from future exploitation."
funniest s*** about all this to me is how he's only suing Spotify and not Apple Music, Tidal, Amazon Music etc
Lamar is not named as a respondent in the filing and is not legally accused of any wrongdoing
"the source told The Independent, if Drake is successful at tamping down wrongdoing throughout the industry, the result could help protect other, less well-known artists from future exploitation."
Iffy justification
Lamar is not named as a respondent in the filing and is not legally accused of any wrongdoing
i know that was in the first lawsuit is that in the second one too?
Aged like milk
All that hoorah bullshit man just for drake to be a dumbass once again.
Niggas tryna make him out to be f***in robin hood. Hes just a square
Lamar is not named as a respondent in the filing and is not legally accused of any wrongdoing
UMG bout to sue him themselves to save their ass
I think this should be the clear indicator that he is indeed not a a rapper but rather an actor playing a rapper who has a brand image to uphold.
i know that was in the first lawsuit is that in the second one too?
yeah it is, it's only directed at UMG