No they weren't
Then what Vogue tripping for? It was clear it was fake before the day ended lol plus it was clearly a promo gimmick. Then again I heard AW a hard ass.
Dam they lost already
https://twitter.com/TMZ/status/1590813905361641472Vogue is like Disney-big in regards to their legal team
Open shut case
Dam they lost already
https://twitter.com/TMZ/status/1590813905361641472This kind of an empty headline because they aren’t actively selling it. It’s already done
Dam they lost already
https://twitter.com/TMZ/status/1590813905361641472This is just extending their promo by making these headlines, easy W
hello lawyers
they in here
This project gonna be special. You not covering Vogue for some thrown together tape BS. (One can hope anyway)
Shoutout for being quoted in a lawsuit and highlighted

historic thread
isn’t this like the second time US Vogue has had only men and no woman on the cover? that’s huge
So huge you just lost Drake 4 million
It's real. Also magazines can have multiple covers

Shoutout for being quoted in a lawsuit and highlighted

wait wtf is this ??
wait wtf is this ??
Your post is highlighted as evidence
if feds are in the drake section who knows what kinda sleeper agents are in g&g
The cover in OP has to be fake. The October issue of Vogue has been out since September and the articles on the cover are even older
Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, it’s clear Vogue is cherry-picking posts to fit their narrative. Here we have a user at the time who could tell the magazine was parody

if feds are in the drake section who knows what kinda sleeper agents are in g&g
Chip skylark a goner