Reply
  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    NobodyWins

    ….

    Wow. Now you owe me $100

  • 666

    Drake is a Satanist

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    ICEMAN40

    There’s no way you believe this

    It's nothing about what I believe. I'm explaining the law and legal strategy being used by UMG

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ICEMAN40

    Wow. Now you owe me $100

    Dude!

  • BM_ 🌠
    Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    2 replies
    ICEMAN40

    Yeah can I see you say “drake won”?

    I'll say that for 100 gang

  • Mar 18, 2025
    BM_

    I'll say that for 100 gang

    Sellout

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    STEPPA PIG

    It's nothing about what I believe. I'm explaining the law and legal strategy being used by UMG

    Ok. There’s no way UMG is expecting that to work

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    BM_

    I'll say that for 100 gang

    Offer expired. Need you to post “need more” in the papiconda thread now.

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ICEMAN40

    Offer expired. Need you to post “need more” in the papiconda thread now.

    I need a lawyer

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ICEMAN40

    Ok. There’s no way UMG is expecting that to work

    Truth is a defence to defamation. Not actual truth, subjective belief of the truth. UMG could say "This was a narrative in existence long before Kendrick dropped NLU, see Taylor Made. See this article about Drake texting Millie Bobbie Brown. See these videos of Drake kissing girls on stage AFTER finding out they were minors. So he believed the statement was true". And Drake's team would have a difficult time trying to prove Kendrick did not in fact believe it based on all of this

  • Mar 18, 2025
    Tilia

    How many videos are there of drake

    Don't go down the same road TheGropeDivine did

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    2 replies

    Idk gang. If it they have nothing to lose and Drake is just bluffing then why keep trying to dismiss the case time after time like you u scared of some discovering process being done at your facility. Idk if I was guilty I would try to delay the case as much as possible so I can delete as much evidence as possible and I was innocent instead I would humiliate him with the same confidence i promoted the diss

  • Mar 18, 2025
    CRACKASTEPPAVEGAN

    Sounds like rolling dice

    Basically is. This is a case where an older less “tapped in” judge would 100% side with Drake in many cases unless they’ve handled similar cases w/ differing verdicts before. Laws and cases surrounding this topic are really all over the place.

  • Mar 18, 2025

    Just read through UMGs motion

    One thing I forgot that they brought up is Drake literally says “and that f***ing song y’all got did not start this beef with us, This s*** been brewin in a pot now I’m heating up”

    Drake himself is saying Like That didn’t start the beef

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    2 replies

    Drake fans been going off with “How did Drake provoke the beef!? Like That did!”

    When Drake himself literally says Like That didn’t start the beef

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    2 replies
    notbrock

    Drake fans been going off with “How did Drake provoke the beef!? Like That did!”

    When Drake himself literally says Like That didn’t start the beef

    More cope.

  • Mar 18, 2025
    notbrock

    Drake fans been going off with “How did Drake provoke the beef!? Like That did!”

    When Drake himself literally says Like That didn’t start the beef

    He even said “I’ve been waiting 10 years for this”

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ICEMAN40

    More cope.

    In what way is that cope

    That’s Drakes actual words

    You’re trolling right?

  • Mar 18, 2025
    VAAANTAAA

    Idk gang. If it they have nothing to lose and Drake is just bluffing then why keep trying to dismiss the case time after time like you u scared of some discovering process being done at your facility. Idk if I was guilty I would try to delay the case as much as possible so I can delete as much evidence as possible and I was innocent instead I would humiliate him with the same confidence i promoted the diss

    I mean youre just begging the question at that point
    We know why they dont want to go into discovery because it would be messy and not even just for UMG but for Drake as well
    I dont think anyone is under any presumption that UMG doesnt have something to hide
    Its more about the implications of what happens after Drake wins the case and what that does to music forever

  • Mar 18, 2025

    666

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    2 replies

    Funniest part is if Drake actually gets awarded damages, this case now becomes precedent for Kendrick Lamar to sue Drake for damages about the domestic abuse, Whitney being unfaithful, Dave Free being the actual father of his son lies in his diss tracks. And Kendrick would have a way easier time winning in that lawsuit because unlike the Drake pedo narrative, Drake literally just made it up without it being a narrative before his tracks

    I don't think Kendrick would actually sue him because he understands how much of a bad look running to court like this is but would be hilarious af

  • Mar 18, 2025

    😈

  • Mar 18, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    STEPPA PIG

    Funniest part is if Drake actually gets awarded damages, this case now becomes precedent for Kendrick Lamar to sue Drake for damages about the domestic abuse, Whitney being unfaithful, Dave Free being the actual father of his son lies in his diss tracks. And Kendrick would have a way easier time winning in that lawsuit because unlike the Drake pedo narrative, Drake literally just made it up without it being a narrative before his tracks

    I don't think Kendrick would actually sue him because he understands how much of a bad look running to court like this is but would be hilarious af

    Kendrick doesnt but Whitney definitely could since she was a bystander implicated in this completely unnecessarily

    granted at that point they would just go suit for suit, cuz if whitney does it then sandra could do it then if sandra does it dave free could do it then if dave free does it then dennis could do it

  • Duddas ☢️
    Mar 18, 2025
    ICEMAN40

    More cope.

    Blocking me in the cord
    Wild s***

  • Mar 18, 2025
    Takotchi

    Kendrick doesnt but Whitney definitely could since she was a bystander implicated in this completely unnecessarily

    granted at that point they would just go suit for suit, cuz if whitney does it then sandra could do it then if sandra does it dave free could do it then if dave free does it then dennis could do it

    I disagree. UMG didn't make any statements about Drake being a pdf, yet he's suing them. And it would be easy for Kendrick to claim he suffered harm/loss because of these statements