Man half of y'all need to go touch grass or a job application
I make time to troll on the clock and get paid for it
Thought this was a crash out post until I realized these are Drake snaps??
yeah promotion for her loss
I need to find higher resolution images though so it doesn't look like I'm just posting anime p*** lol
when was the last time drake had a successful rap single?
Define successful?🤔
if he'd just groped a teenager once it would have been okay, right?
Man half of y'all need to go touch grass or a job application

Why do people think he's suing the streamers lol. They're only listed as references to support the argument made in the suit
Some people clearly misunderstanding this based on the post above mine^
But even using them as evidence is lame af. It's like he's skirting around Kendrick, the nigga who actually said these allegedly defamatory things about him, but dragging everyone else into this petty bullshit and accusing them of doing something wrong
Not a***ogous to this suit at all. A news network falsely accusing someone of profiting from and exploiting people trying to escape Afghanistan in a news report presented as factual is not the same as Drake crying at a label because a rapper said some mean things about him in a song and they promoted it
Truth is a defence to defamation in almost every jurisdiction around the world. All UMG have to do is show evidence that Drake has displayed inappropriate behaviour around underage girls. And you know that'll be easy to do
suing streamers is an all time low
Streamers aren't getting sued. Spotify ain't named in this new lawsuit. He going strictly at UMG. Drake and Spotify may have worked something out hence them coming into an agreement and not denying the allegations, unlike UMG
suing streamers is an all time low
ahh yes. drake is suing the streamers and youtubers, u made the whole connection

Not a***ogous to this suit at all. A news network falsely accusing someone of profiting from and exploiting people trying to escape Afghanistan in a news report presented as factual is not the same as Drake crying at a label because a rapper said some mean things about him in a song and they promoted it
Truth is a defence to defamation in almost every jurisdiction around the world. All UMG have to do is show evidence that Drake has displayed inappropriate behaviour around underage girls. And you know that'll be easy to do
You are in for a big disappointment if you think that's going to happen and even if they found anything that hasn't already been debunked by all those women themselves that isn't going to be enough to prove to any judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that he is a pedophile and therefore NLU is factual. All Drake has to do is show these at the trial and UMG would have no leg to stand on

The real world ain't like twitter. You can't just post s*** out of context to make someone look bad and get a bunch of npc niggas to like it and you win. Lies have serious consequences
You are in for a big disappointment if you think that's going to happen and even if they found anything that hasn't already been debunked by all those women themselves that isn't going to be enough to prove to any judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that he is a pedophile and therefore NLU is factual. All Drake has to do is show these at the trial and UMG would have no leg to stand on

The real world ain't like twitter. You can't just post s*** out of context to make someone look bad and get a bunch of npc niggas to like it and you win. Lies have serious consequences
lmfao you think victims of grooming saying the grooming was okay removes any criminal responsibility? was it okay that tyga f***ed kylie jenner when she was 15 just because she said she didn't mind?
Drake objectively likes them young, Kendrick never lied, lawsuit has no grounds other than hurt feelings
You are in for a big disappointment if you think that's going to happen and even if they found anything that hasn't already been debunked by all those women themselves that isn't going to be enough to prove to any judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that he is a pedophile and therefore NLU is factual. All Drake has to do is show these at the trial and UMG would have no leg to stand on

The real world ain't like twitter. You can't just post s*** out of context to make someone look bad and get a bunch of npc niggas to like it and you win. Lies have serious consequences
1. This is a civil suit, not criminal. Standard of proof is on a balance of probabilities, not beyond a reasonable doubt
2. Niggas ITT found multiple videos of this nigga kissing/grinding with underage or barely legal girls at concerts. Imagine what a team of lawyers for a massive corporation could dig up
3. "Lies have consequences" Drake himself capped in this beef and said some egregious things about Kendrick and his family. Domestic violence is a crime too. The fact that you fail to see how Drake is a sore loser and whiny b**** for running to court just because his songs didn't take off the same way Kendrick's did does not make discussing this topic with you any further worth my time.
"Fama" basically = reputation, your good standing in the community. Defamation is the degradation of that. Drake has to prove that his reputation has actually suffered harm/loss due to the conduct of UMG
Ironically, all these "The elimination of Drake was not successful", "still the highest streamed rapper on Spotify 2024" tweets you Drake stans have been posting to prove that he's still successful after the beef could be used against him in this lawsuit