Reply
  • Jan 15, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    New Vagabond

    The lawsuit is calling lyrics of the song antisemite which is Kendricks song

    can you directly cite via photo and direct text ? Its not that I dont trust the intelligence or character of users on here oh wait its exactly that

  • Jan 15, 2025
    Mark Moschino

    i saw that and really appreciated my dude, i sent you some dm's thanking you but I'm gonna thank u here too

    ima take a look and respond.

    No thanks needed brother, I’m just glad you and your parents are making it day by day.

  • Jan 15, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    NewCopeJustDropped
    https://twitter.com/guardabascio/status/1879618299564323046

    Everything Drake says and does ages horribly

  • Jan 15, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    Headass

    "as a huge drake fan"

    He had some nice funny posts/trolling, he is missed lol

  • Jan 15, 2025
    ·
    2 replies
    HANI

    He had some nice funny posts/trolling, he is missed lol

    dig him up then

  • Duddas ☢️
    Jan 15, 2025
    OVOJersey

    Mf's itt be like


    yo how isnt this bannable but if i say that other thing (we know what it is ) it is

  • Jan 15, 2025
    OHMNI

    dig him up then

  • Jan 15, 2025
    ·
    1 reply

    This part is wilder imo. They coming for him

    “Throughout his career, Drake has intentionally and successfully used UMG to distribute his music and poetry to engage in conventionally outrageous back-and-forth ‘rap battles’ to express his feelings about other artists. He now seeks to weaponize the legal process to silence an artist’s creative expression and to seek damages from UMG for distributing that artist’s music.

    “We have not and do not engage in defamation — against any individual,” the statement concludes. “At the same time, we will vigorously defend this litigation to protect our people and our reputation, as well as any artist who might directly or indirectly become a frivolous litigation target for having done nothing more that write a song.”

  • Jan 15, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    OHMNI

    "implied"

    I dont need you stupid motherfuckers implying anything

    I'm not implying anything dumb f***. Drake suggests so

  • Jan 15, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    shady23axd

    I'm not implying anything dumb f***. Drake suggests so

    post the direct part of the case

  • Jan 15, 2025
    NICEMAN

    I get that, the older generation in my family might respond the same way tbh. My perspective is, the only thing connecting the two of you is that your cousin and her cousin got married. That's not close enough of a connection for anything to be weird (unless maybe they got married years ago and y'all grew up together knowing each other as family)

    Yea ight I get you, I guess I was leaning more towards the end of what you just said cause that’s how my family is

  • Jan 15, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    OHMNI

    Its UMG that got this song blasted everywhere not Kendrick...

    That’s what labels do.. don’t change the fact I’ve heard it played in real life in real time. but nobody is “defending” UMG. We know they manipulate the market, it’s only Drake fans that think they do it for everyone except the niggas they invested $400 million.

  • Kr0niic ☘️
    Jan 15, 2025
    ·
    2 replies
    OHMNI

    can you cite where he calls Kendrick Lamar Duckworth Antisemitic and not his fans doing so ?

  • SWAN 💜
    Jan 15, 2025
    Deezed

    Kenny cock cobblers still mentioning kenny meanwhile:

    “Interestingly, Drake isn't going directly after Kendrick in the suit -- in fact, he says, "This lawsuit is not about the artist who created 'Not Like Us.' It is, instead, entirely about UMG.”

    going after Kenny directly would have looked worse optically ngl

    drake knows not to do that

  • Jan 15, 2025
    OHMNI

    can you directly cite via photo and direct text ? Its not that I dont trust the intelligence or character of users on here oh wait its exactly that

    Its somewhere in this thread. Find it yourself

  • Jan 15, 2025
    Kr0niic

    Bdot reach

  • Jan 15, 2025

    they about to put this nigga through the blender

  • Jan 15, 2025
    ·
    2 replies

    Drake

  • Jan 15, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    krishna bound

    its possible to admit drake looks like a rɛtard for filing this suit while also a***yzing the actual claims within it. like yes he obviously is only filing this because he lost but that doesnt really mean the claims in it are automatically bogus. there's interesting claims in the lawsuit and it's way more fleshed out than anything in the spotify one

    Yeah sure but not immediately taking Drake side doesn’t mean people are “defending” UMG.

  • Jan 15, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    mjpplus

    Drake

    Mjpplus

  • Jan 15, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    atthepyramids

    Mjpplus

    atthepyramids

  • Jan 15, 2025
    mjpplus

    atthepyramids

  • Jan 15, 2025
  • Jan 15, 2025
    ·
    3 replies
    Kr0niic

    yall do realize Drake doesnt write this right? you thought they were going to say white when jewish is a much more protected class than wihte?

    that isnt implying anti-Semitism that is leveraging modern politics rather than saying "white heritage" . there is no way they will in court try to paint that Kendrick cares about zionism when again Kendrick claims to be a black israelite with his stupid hotep mandingo b**** ass

  • Jan 15, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    AvenueJones

    That’s what labels do.. don’t change the fact I’ve heard it played in real life in real time. but nobody is “defending” UMG. We know they manipulate the market, it’s only Drake fans that think they do it for everyone except the niggas they invested $400 million.

    again yall have a different idea of the claims of pedophilia and declaring a grown man a pedophile