This^
They’re doing too much lol these clowns need to stick to their day job and put down the tin foil hat
What's unfortunate is that I'm more than down to have legit conversations about creeps and pedophiles and groomers in Hollywood (there's MANY of them with actual accusations still working and not getting any smoke for their actions) but the idiots on this site will never go for that. They'd rather ragebait Drake fans because they don't actually give a f*** about groomers or pedophiles. They just pretend they do when it's time for them to try to piss off Drake fans. It's really sad but I shouldn't be surprised it's what happens on this site.
I have better things to do than read ''Blind Items''. I also find it disturbing that those people prefer to go viral on the internet rather than report such things - ''Diddy Blind Items'' as you claim were posted - to the police.
Well first off nobody goes viral off blind items because they’re completely anonymous for protection. Idk if you know this but you can’t just run to the police in every situation, Especially if you’re dealing with a rich powerful individual
You also completely dodged my question. I don’t care if you find it disturbing. Is all kinds of blind items coming out about diddy before it really surfaced just a coincidence or not?
What's unfortunate is that I'm more than down to have legit conversations about creeps and pedophiles and groomers in Hollywood (there's MANY of them with actual accusations still working and not getting any smoke for their actions) but the idiots on this site will never go for that. They'd rather ragebait Drake fans because they don't actually give a f*** about groomers or pedophiles. They just pretend they do when it's time for them to try to piss off Drake fans. It's really sad but I shouldn't be surprised it's what happens on this site.
What is so hard to understand by drake stans
Even without accusations, the repetition of situations where Drake is publicly linked to girls under 18, combined with visible affection (onstage kissing) or private contact (texting) will look suspicious to many people.
The key here is choice: a high-profile adult repeatedly putting himself in situations that could be misconstrued, despite knowing the PR risk, can be seen as poor judgment at best, calculated boundary-pushing at worst.
What's unfortunate is that I'm more than down to have legit conversations about creeps and pedophiles and groomers in Hollywood (there's MANY of them with actual accusations still working and not getting any smoke for their actions) but the idiots on this site will never go for that. They'd rather ragebait Drake fans because they don't actually give a f*** about groomers or pedophiles. They just pretend they do when it's time for them to try to piss off Drake fans. It's really sad but I shouldn't be surprised it's what happens on this site.
So Drake has numerous associations with underaged and/or extremely young women, and has a civil sexual assault case that he settled to prevent from going to trial, and you don’t think there’s truth to any of these things whatsoever?
The truth always comes to light
Prime example being Diddy and R. Kelly
For every Kelly and Diddy their are 100 perverts never caught
Are y’all this dumb on purpose?
Not even saying Drake is a pedo, but that logic is terrible
Well first off nobody goes viral off blind items because they’re completely anonymous for protection. Idk if you know this but you can’t just run to the police in every situation, Especially if you’re dealing with a rich powerful individual
You also completely dodged my question. I don’t care if you find it disturbing. Is all kinds of blind items coming out about diddy before it really surfaced just a coincidence or not?
Their statements go viral. Most of the ''blind items'' are fake stories that people invent so those false stories go viral on social media. Can some of them be true? Sure. Majority of them written by trolls? No.
And what do you mean with ''you can't just run to the police if you experienced a crime''? You don't care about justice?
I already told you that - unlike you - I don't waste my time reading Blind Items so I can't confirm whether or not it's true.
Huh? There are plenty of male creeps in Hollywood in positive positions that didn’t commit any actual crimes but are still with women WAY too young for them
Harvey Weinstein - Jail
R. Kelly - Jail
Diddy - potentially facing jail
People face consequences lol just cause s*** goes unnoticed doesn’t mean it never sees the light. The fact people on here love toting around all of Drake’s wrong doings and behavior IN THE PUBLIC EYE keep in mind. Why was there never an investigation into any of it, why did he never face criminal charges, why did all the various celebs refute everything ya'll choose to ignore? Nobody can answer these simple questions lol
What's unfortunate is that I'm more than down to have legit conversations about creeps and pedophiles and groomers in Hollywood (there's MANY of them with actual accusations still working and not getting any smoke for their actions) but the idiots on this site will never go for that. They'd rather ragebait Drake fans because they don't actually give a f*** about groomers or pedophiles. They just pretend they do when it's time for them to try to piss off Drake fans. It's really sad but I shouldn't be surprised it's what happens on this site.
100% spot on 🎯
Civil. But the Metro one is civil too.
On both stances that to me is a red flag. Also funny how Metro deleted a bunch of odd creepy tweets but people love to forget that and play it off as well.
Sizzurp Steve
Is it slightly weird for a cracker to name themselves this or what
F*** all pedos on God not just Lawbrey
What is so hard to understand by drake stans
Even without accusations, the repetition of situations where Drake is publicly linked to girls under 18, combined with visible affection (onstage kissing) or private contact (texting) will look suspicious to many people.
The key here is choice: a high-profile adult repeatedly putting himself in situations that could be misconstrued, despite knowing the PR risk, can be seen as poor judgment at best, calculated boundary-pushing at worst.
The stage incident happened 15 years ago. That's not something recent at all so stop trying to use that as some sort of gotcha.
He never dated Bella Harris, Millie Bobby Brown, Billie Eilish or Kylie Jenner. People jumped and assumed the worst off of him simply interacting with them (famous younger celebrities) in any way. That's not on him, that's on the idiots who tried to unsuccessfully paint him out as something he isn't.
You can make a long list of adult celebs who have had public/private interactions with famous teenagers. If you're not going to suggest that makes them weirdos pedophiles then stop trying to make that case for Drake, especially when the very women you keep referring to as "proof" have each come out to flat-out deny any wrongdoing on his part.
At this point, it's more about you people wishing he's a pedophile than him actually being one and that's f***ing weird but carry on
On both stances that to me is a red flag. Also funny how Metro deleted a bunch of odd creepy tweets but people love to forget that and play it off as well.
And luckily we don’t have metro stans saying “name another time he publicly groped a woman”
Most people can agree when someone does something weird, y’all seem to be the only ones constantly complaining
DaGropeDivine casually ignoring brother IcyNecks post
@IcyNeck
@Zackbrah @quadra @thegreatdivine Any thoughts on this my chaps?
Is it slightly weird for a cracker to name themselves this or what
Steve from Blues Clues is doing cool ass s*** on the internet these days I have just learned (no I don’t mean ktt posting)
@Zackbrah @quadra @thegreatdivine Any thoughts on this my chaps?
They’ll say it’s fraudulent