Reply
  • ·
    1 reply
    · 
    Hazyeyefreakmonstr

    Stem splitting is great

    it takes sampling to a whole new level. and the quality of the stems are getting better each day.

  • ·
    1 reply

  • Karl Marx

    As someone who has worked closely with members of Dre’s team (you can check the threads for TI - Kill The King where I posted lyrics from the Dre produced track Where I’m From before it dropped or the thread for the Game mixtape last year where I posted about the intro track before it dropped, if you want to question my credentials) I can assure you Dre is not using any generative AI.

    What he is using is the machine learning “de-mixing” technology that Peter Jackson and Giles Martin developed for Now & Then by the Beatles, which both separates the stems and cleans each one up individually (you can turn a bad demo tape into lossless quality with this tech).

    He is indeed using it on the upcoming Springsteen project, and he already used it for the Tom Petty track on Snoop Dogg’s Missionary.

  • ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    Juggernaut

    it takes sampling to a whole new level. and the quality of the stems are getting better each day.

    I disagree, havent heard a model that beats the one on the version of uvr5 i havent updated in 3 years

  • sfsorrow

  • ·
    1 reply
    Hazyeyefreakmonstr

    Stem splitting is great

    Its cool for making s***ty soundcloud remixes but i dont think it has a place in remastering, esp when these people have a much bigger budget than you or I

  • ·
    1 reply
    · 
    nocomment

    I disagree, havent heard a model that beats the one on the version of uvr5 i havent updated in 3 years

    see, I think it depends on what your end goal is. I use it to create not recreate, that's the main difference.

  • ·
    1 reply
    Rightside

    A.I. rn is FL Studio back when

    So all those producers/music made with Fl studio has to be treated the same

    You got to understand A.I. is a tool, it's very hard to use if you don't know anything about music, you get generic stuff that may sound ok but it's always going to take a human to decipher what stays and goes.

    Reminder: Back in the day, we hired other musicians to play certain
    things. It's no different. or used a randomizer to fill in notes or create different melodies through software...so....

    I think those who oppose A.I. are still banging sticks and stones, and big mad when wind instruments were made.

    DAWs were made by real people who drank only a few litres of water per day, presumably did not overconsume eletricity, did not pollute the surrounding environment with carcinogens, and were not trained using petabytes of stolen art.

    Youre misguided if you think the equivalence is at all valid

  • nocomment

    Its cool for making s***ty soundcloud remixes but i dont think it has a place in remastering, esp when these people have a much bigger budget than you or I

    Fair

  • ·
    1 reply
    Juggernaut

    see, I think it depends on what your end goal is. I use it to create not recreate, that's the main difference.

    The fft artifacts stick out like a sore thumb unless you mask it with a lot of other instruments

    Also are you a robot? You didnt actually respond to what i said

  • · 
    nocomment

    DAWs were made by real people who drank only a few litres of water per day, presumably did not overconsume eletricity, did not pollute the surrounding environment with carcinogens, and were not trained using petabytes of stolen art.

    Youre misguided if you think the equivalence is at all valid

    so A.I. wasn't created by real people. And there's a new A.I. farm on water, and hip hop is basically made from stealing other people's music.

    You sound dumb.

    It's a tool, some folks don't know how to use so they think its the devil.

    Think how the first person who invented the drums was looked at.

    Then the drummers who dislike a drum machine.

    It's evolution 101

    A.I. can not create without a human's input.

    And how you prompt something in A.I. even if you word it slightly different gets you a different result.

    And the masses have already proven it's point, its here to stay, get over it.

  • Karl Marx

    As someone who has worked closely with members of Dre’s team (you can check the threads for TI - Kill The King where I posted lyrics from the Dre produced track Where I’m From before it dropped or the thread for the Game mixtape last year where I posted about the intro track before it dropped, if you want to question my credentials) I can assure you Dre is not using any generative AI.

    What he is using is the machine learning “de-mixing” technology that Peter Jackson and Giles Martin developed for Now & Then by the Beatles, which both separates the stems and cleans each one up individually (you can turn a bad demo tape into lossless quality with this tech).

    He is indeed using it on the upcoming Springsteen project, and he already used it for the Tom Petty track on Snoop Dogg’s Missionary.

    Have you met Michelle Sanei?

  • · 
    nocomment

    The fft artifacts stick out like a sore thumb unless you mask it with a lot of other instruments

    Also are you a robot? You didnt actually respond to what i said

    depends on how well u trained in engineer, i just adjust the freq. fyi that's how u get lost in the sauce

  • sniper

    Even his smiley AI

  • zenirama

    I overhear conversations at my job about how awesome chatgpt and ai is constantly and i don’t even work in tech

    Majority of people do not care

    yea at my last corporate job I was typing emails to clients and my manager said just use chatGPT the CFO was spending $1k per month of company money on AI software to make tracking company finances easier. Everyone was a boomer who worked there. S*** is fried

1
...
6
7