No questions from the defense

That was Cassie's mom

Good idea not to go at her.

The defense is smart.

Judge: We'll pick it up after Doctor Hughes. Please get her back on the stand.
Witness entering; jury entering!
Combs' Bach: You are with the American Psychological Association - which says you should only render an opinion after an examination, right?
Dr Hughes: Where?

Dr. Hughes: This is a different role.
Combs' Bach: You have not gathered information about this case, right?
Dr. Hughes: I am not rendering an opinion on any individual.
Bach: There someone named Cassie, but you don't know what she said, right?
Dr. Hughes: I don't

This trial can't be real

Combs' Bach: You're testified across the river in EDNY, right?
Dr. Hughes: Right.
Bach: And you say the same thing, even those the cases are different, correct?
Dr. Hughes: It's to help the jurors understand
Bach: But it's their job to consider their case, right?

Combs' Bach: You don't publish data on the patients you have evaluated, do you?
Dr. Hughes: It's confidential.
Bach: So I can't cross check your experience, the basis of what you are saying, right?

Combs' Bach: People might go to a civil lawyer to make a little money, right?
AUSA: Objection!
Judge: Let's more on.
Bach: In civil litigation, you might looks for malingering, right?

Bruh They obviously getting a huge bag for it, but being in court for hours everyday and still working at f***ing 11PM sounds grueling

Some of photo's of the Diddy raid have been released

More photos of the raid

Being this freaky at 50 years old is crazy

lol when are you supposed to stop being freaky

diddy still doing this fairly openly after the rebrand is what's crazy. Not even that this after cassies lawsuit and th vid dropped

Nitrous Oxide

Aint that what Ye was addicted to?

yea

that seems to be the wave these days

even the kids are doing it

This nigga got a green suit case like he’s the Riddler lmao

@GetPunished

this s*** is so f***ing freaky wtf

Judge: Jurors, we're going to send you to the jury room for a bit
All rise!
Jurors leave.
Judge: Yesterday Ms. Shapiro submitted an exhibit ex parte... Now reviewing a document, what should I focus on?
AUSA: It shouldn't show this witness has a bias

More context and details:

The defense team wants to ask expert witness Dawn Hughes about a webinar presentation she gave in 2015 about preparing for court testimony.

The prosecution said they don’t believe the presentation shows any evidence of potential bias from her.

Defense attorney Jonathan Bach said the webinar was training for battered women advocates.

Judge: She can be shown the document, about training domestic violence advocates, and asked if she remembers. But I won't admit it as evidence, until she denied it and it becomes Prior Inconsistent Statement.

[Witness re-enters, then jury]
Combs' Bach: Does this document refresh your recollection?
Dr. Hughes: Let me look at it more closely... Yes.
Bach: The 4th part is about Navigating Cross Examination, right?
Dr. Hughes: Yes.