Essential Track(s): The first old Kanye song your player of choice skips to after Jesus Is King ends.
![]()
f***ing crying
Is an F really a 0?
Wouldn't it just mean <6/10 if you're using an Alphabetical Grading Scale?
C+/B- would be a 6
C+/B- would be a 6
Which is weird because 6 would be a D- to D+ IRL.
Like I said, grading albums on an alphabetical scale is stupid. It's just overcomplicating a system that already works.
Which is weird because 6 would be a D- to D+ IRL.
Like I said, grading albums on an alphabetical scale is stupid. It's just overcomplicating a system that already works.
not if you understand that C just means average, not the specific score on a test
?
C means average b. i.e. 5/10
tests are marked different bc the average student wouldnt only get half the questions right
Lmao at these ugly doughey white guys mocking a guy's physical appearance for giving a bad album a bad score. At least this dude has had s***before.
Lmao at these ugly doughey white guys mocking a guy's physical appearance for giving a bad album a bad score. At least this dude has had s***before.
S***doesn’t count if she’s not Barbara Palvin tier
S***doesn’t count if she’s not Barbara Palvin tier
S***also doesn't count if you've never had sex. Referring to anyone who uses the term "beta" or thinks JIK is above a 5.
S***also doesn't count if you've never had sex. Referring to anyone who uses the term "beta" or thinks JIK is above a 5.
Imagine having premarital s***in 2019
people itt that are attacking the critics looks instead of the actual points of the review are bunch of f***ing cornballs
Well what do you honestly expect?
You think half of them actually read the interview?
Well what do you honestly expect?
You think half of them actually read the interview?
yeah u right i'm a f***ing dumbass
i forgot where i was for a minute
people itt that are attacking the critics looks instead of the actual points of the review are bunch of f***ing cornballs
some agreement, but it's not a far cry from a reflection of what the critic himself is doing. he points out parts of the music he finds interesting then gives it a 0 alongside general character bashing.
he calls the clipse verses "bursting into a Sunday service with Saturday’s whiskey breath", which is stupid hyperbole that is also his only sort of support for the claim that they're "out of place". he completely mischaracterizes Selah by saying that the choir is whispering "hallelujah" at the beginning, which 1) they never whisper, 2) not at the beginning. he incorrectly says that follow god uses the sample from FSMH pt. 1. he calls the idea of not using social media to be "dull" despite so many acknowledgments in society (even by people involved w/ the creation of online social media itself) that social media isn't good and many, many people are addicted to it.
hell, the line "Kanye West talks endlessly about God, and yet he musters a fraction of the enthusiasm that he used to deploy in observations about the female buttocks", while amusing if true, is an actual lie. he just didn't want to listen to songs like Selah, Closed on Sunday, or God Is with any sort of earnestness because then he might have to say something positive about them. also, is demonstrated enthusiasm the metric for believing in God? probably not.
he's coming across tone deaf because he'd rather hate kanye than listen to what kanye could possibly be saying
which is basically what these ad hominem replies are doing
so
seems just to me
"Jesus, flow through us
Jesus, heal the bruises
Jesus, clean the music
Jesus, please use us
Jesus, please help
Jesus, please heal
Jesus, please forgive
Jesus, please reveal
Jesus, give us strength
Jesus, make us well
Jesus, help us live
Jesus, give us wealth
Jesus is our safe
Jesus is our rock
Jesus, give us grace
Jesus, keep us safe"

"vaguely religious gesturing, yea, that's it"
some agreement, but it's not a far cry from a reflection of what the critic himself is doing. he points out parts of the music he finds interesting then gives it a 0 alongside general character bashing.
he calls the clipse verses "bursting into a Sunday service with Saturday’s whiskey breath", which is stupid hyperbole that is also his only sort of support for the claim that they're "out of place". he completely mischaracterizes Selah by saying that the choir is whispering "hallelujah" at the beginning, which 1) they never whisper, 2) not at the beginning. he incorrectly says that follow god uses the sample from FSMH pt. 1. he calls the idea of not using social media to be "dull" despite so many acknowledgments in society (even by people involved w/ the creation of online social media itself) that social media isn't good and many, many people are addicted to it.
hell, the line "Kanye West talks endlessly about God, and yet he musters a fraction of the enthusiasm that he used to deploy in observations about the female buttocks", while amusing if true, is an actual lie. he just didn't want to listen to songs like Selah, Closed on Sunday, or God Is with any sort of earnestness because then he might have to say something positive about them. also, is demonstrated enthusiasm the metric for believing in God? probably not.
he's coming across tone deaf because he'd rather hate kanye than listen to what kanye could possibly be saying
which is basically what these ad hominem replies are doing
so
seems just to me
isn't it more effective to do what you just did, which is point out the inconsistencies of the review than flat out just insult the critics look and accomplish absolutely f***ing nothing?
isn't it more effective to do what you just did, which is point out the inconsistencies of the review than flat out just insult the critics look and accomplish absolutely f***ing nothing?
ya i just wanted to argue as a way of expressing my distaste for this review