Jul 17
jiveHow audible is the dialogue
Contrast in scenes or getting used to scenes lit by flame ( gives a flickering feeling ) odder than sound but you get used to it
Jul 17
CrimsonArkWhat the f*** is Nolan even gonna do after this?
Citizen Vigilante 2
- Jul 17Vile
Ideally (for me) that's a mixture of Annihilation, this, and The Green Knight
Men final minutes too
- Jul 17
CRACKASTEPPAVEGANLook out for the scene with Travis playing astroworld for Matt Damon's character on a walkman. Beautiful stuff
Kylie cameo was crazy why Travis f*** her . Feel Timothee will be mad about that scene Nolan a demon
Jul 17
RICHAXXVOYCEStill wondering why Agamemnon’s face is never revealed
aura
Jul 17
KeepTheRobinsonwhat do you know about the sea?
not a whole lot, but a little cause my dad had a sailboat
- Jul 17
BIRDIN84Prime Nolan vs Prime Villeneuve this year
What a time to be alive
Jul 17·7 repliesNolan took a very personal emotional poem about a man's yearning for return, stripped it of its core mechanics (the intrigues, the dialogue the driving forces) added CGI by the bucketload + a Viking Ship from the 11th century AD and called it a day.
If I had to draw an a***ogy it's like Murder on the Orient Express with Albert Finney as Poirot vs Ken Branagh's Murder on the Orient Express.
One stays faithful to the source material and pays an homage to Agatha Christie's work with Albert Finney being the golden standard as Poirot (till David Suchet came to the scene who lived in the part for a quarter century). In fact Christie actually endorsed the film (she was very critical of film adaptations of her work) but jested that the mustache was not glorious enough.
The other is an uber engineered wide lense film with helicopter shots where Branagh is butchering Poirot's character.... with a budget of about 90mn most of it going to CGI and green screens.
One is about characters and texture, the other is about CGI and architecture. Ditto Homer's The Odyssey vs Nolan's The Travesty.
So I will be skipping this.... Perhaps I will give it a watch on streaming services if I have 30 mins to kill and there's nothing better to do.
Jul 17this is not an altNolan took a very personal emotional poem about a man's yearning for return, stripped it of its core mechanics (the intrigues, the dialogue the driving forces) added CGI by the bucketload + a Viking Ship from the 11th century AD and called it a day.
If I had to draw an a***ogy it's like Murder on the Orient Express with Albert Finney as Poirot vs Ken Branagh's Murder on the Orient Express.
One stays faithful to the source material and pays an homage to Agatha Christie's work with Albert Finney being the golden standard as Poirot (till David Suchet came to the scene who lived in the part for a quarter century). In fact Christie actually endorsed the film (she was very critical of film adaptations of her work) but jested that the mustache was not glorious enough.
The other is an uber engineered wide lense film with helicopter shots where Branagh is butchering Poirot's character.... with a budget of about 90mn most of it going to CGI and green screens.
One is about characters and texture, the other is about CGI and architecture. Ditto Homer's The Odyssey vs Nolan's The Travesty.
So I will be skipping this.... Perhaps I will give it a watch on streaming services if I have 30 mins to kill and there's nothing better to do.
Thank you for this
Jul 17this is not an altNolan took a very personal emotional poem about a man's yearning for return, stripped it of its core mechanics (the intrigues, the dialogue the driving forces) added CGI by the bucketload + a Viking Ship from the 11th century AD and called it a day.
If I had to draw an a***ogy it's like Murder on the Orient Express with Albert Finney as Poirot vs Ken Branagh's Murder on the Orient Express.
One stays faithful to the source material and pays an homage to Agatha Christie's work with Albert Finney being the golden standard as Poirot (till David Suchet came to the scene who lived in the part for a quarter century). In fact Christie actually endorsed the film (she was very critical of film adaptations of her work) but jested that the mustache was not glorious enough.
The other is an uber engineered wide lense film with helicopter shots where Branagh is butchering Poirot's character.... with a budget of about 90mn most of it going to CGI and green screens.
One is about characters and texture, the other is about CGI and architecture. Ditto Homer's The Odyssey vs Nolan's The Travesty.
So I will be skipping this.... Perhaps I will give it a watch on streaming services if I have 30 mins to kill and there's nothing better to do.
It’s gonna flop now
- Jul 17
ANTIThankful to be self-employed (aka unemployed) so I can watch movies at 3pm. Grabbing lunch then it’s time
That sounds nice, should I be self-employed too? My poetry been popping off on Reddit.
Jul 17·1 replythis is not an altNolan took a very personal emotional poem about a man's yearning for return, stripped it of its core mechanics (the intrigues, the dialogue the driving forces) added CGI by the bucketload + a Viking Ship from the 11th century AD and called it a day.
If I had to draw an a***ogy it's like Murder on the Orient Express with Albert Finney as Poirot vs Ken Branagh's Murder on the Orient Express.
One stays faithful to the source material and pays an homage to Agatha Christie's work with Albert Finney being the golden standard as Poirot (till David Suchet came to the scene who lived in the part for a quarter century). In fact Christie actually endorsed the film (she was very critical of film adaptations of her work) but jested that the mustache was not glorious enough.
The other is an uber engineered wide lense film with helicopter shots where Branagh is butchering Poirot's character.... with a budget of about 90mn most of it going to CGI and green screens.
One is about characters and texture, the other is about CGI and architecture. Ditto Homer's The Odyssey vs Nolan's The Travesty.
So I will be skipping this.... Perhaps I will give it a watch on streaming services if I have 30 mins to kill and there's nothing better to do.
Oh so you didn’t watch it
- Jul 17
I might have to slide in the only IMAX in the state for this one
- Jul 17
Nolan is my goat f*** you niggas
Knew it was just a bunch of conservative chud weirdos on a hate train
Jul 17MarcoPremeOh so you didn’t watch it
Yeah it’s so cringe to me to see people hating on a movie they haven’t even watched. Or to go into a movie wanting to so badly hate it
Pathetic
RASIE 🎣Jul 17The "keep track of all the formats you've seen The Odyssey in" s*** on Letterboxd might be the most cringe thing i've ever seen in my ~10 years of using that app
Jul 17·1 reply- Jul 17https://twitter.com/interneth0f/status/2078043956709928965Millz
It’s at 97 now
Jul 17When is the second round of tickets going on sale? For August 13 and beyond
- Jul 17
AMC and fandango are F***ED RN
Jul 17this is not an altNolan took a very personal emotional poem about a man's yearning for return, stripped it of its core mechanics (the intrigues, the dialogue the driving forces) added CGI by the bucketload + a Viking Ship from the 11th century AD and called it a day.
If I had to draw an a***ogy it's like Murder on the Orient Express with Albert Finney as Poirot vs Ken Branagh's Murder on the Orient Express.
One stays faithful to the source material and pays an homage to Agatha Christie's work with Albert Finney being the golden standard as Poirot (till David Suchet came to the scene who lived in the part for a quarter century). In fact Christie actually endorsed the film (she was very critical of film adaptations of her work) but jested that the mustache was not glorious enough.
The other is an uber engineered wide lense film with helicopter shots where Branagh is butchering Poirot's character.... with a budget of about 90mn most of it going to CGI and green screens.
One is about characters and texture, the other is about CGI and architecture. Ditto Homer's The Odyssey vs Nolan's The Travesty.
So I will be skipping this.... Perhaps I will give it a watch on streaming services if I have 30 mins to kill and there's nothing better to do.
Tf is bro talking about, is this satire ?
- Jul 17·2 replies
“So I will be skipping this.... Perhaps I will give it a watch on streaming services if I have 30 mins to kill and there's nothing better to do.”
Jul 17this is not an altNolan took a very personal emotional poem about a man's yearning for return, stripped it of its core mechanics (the intrigues, the dialogue the driving forces) added CGI by the bucketload + a Viking Ship from the 11th century AD and called it a day.
If I had to draw an a***ogy it's like Murder on the Orient Express with Albert Finney as Poirot vs Ken Branagh's Murder on the Orient Express.
One stays faithful to the source material and pays an homage to Agatha Christie's work with Albert Finney being the golden standard as Poirot (till David Suchet came to the scene who lived in the part for a quarter century). In fact Christie actually endorsed the film (she was very critical of film adaptations of her work) but jested that the mustache was not glorious enough.
The other is an uber engineered wide lense film with helicopter shots where Branagh is butchering Poirot's character.... with a budget of about 90mn most of it going to CGI and green screens.
One is about characters and texture, the other is about CGI and architecture. Ditto Homer's The Odyssey vs Nolan's The Travesty.
So I will be skipping this.... Perhaps I will give it a watch on streaming services if I have 30 mins to kill and there's nothing better to do.
Jul 17·2 repliesBlueDream“So I will be skipping this.... Perhaps I will give it a watch on streaming services if I have 30 mins to kill and there's nothing better to do.”
is what he said true or false though? i haven't seen it and don't plan on doing it
Jul 17·1 replydundisis what he said true or false though? i haven't seen it and don't plan on doing it
then why you here?
