yeah but why do you think that
Because the Bible says so 
This is where faith comes into play
Aside from that, there’s evidence that the events of the Bible did actually occur. Sodom and gomorrah for example
Because the Bible says so 
This is where faith comes into play
Aside from that, there’s evidence that the events of the Bible did actually occur. Sodom and gomorrah for example
i feel like this is the point at which these convos reach a stonewall.
i just don’t see any reason to defer to anything external other than external forces “people/society” telling me i should.
like the man himself is right here. theres nothing to seek
i feel like this is the point at which these convos reach a stonewall.
i just don’t see any reason to defer to anything external other than external forces “people/society” telling me i should.
like the man himself is right here. theres nothing to seek
And you can absolutely do that. Faith has existed before the Bible. The people in the Bible didnt have a Bible
That said, reading the Bible and really letting it open you up spiritually would show you that it really is the word of God and not just a book. I don’t think it’s something that should easily be written off as “just a book”.
It’s an essential reading in our walk. It helps us understand our Lord, his relationship with us, the way he operates, teaches us life lessons, gives advice on the way we should be carrying ourselves, etc
I just think that ignoring the importance of the Bible is kinda like walking in the dark
And you can absolutely do that. Faith has existed before the Bible. The people in the Bible didnt have a Bible
That said, reading the Bible and really letting it open you up spiritually would show you that it really is the word of God and not just a book. I don’t think it’s something that should easily be written off as “just a book”.
It’s an essential reading in our walk. It helps us understand our Lord, his relationship with us, the way he operates, teaches us life lessons, gives advice on the way we should be carrying ourselves, etc
I just think that ignoring the importance of the Bible is kinda like walking in the dark
personally i see it as one part of the equation.
most wordly religions are generally pointing to the same idea when you factor out cultural and social differences.
the conclusion is there for you to find for yourself.
try not to limit yourself to the set of texts you were born into you feel me?
I think you should because you seem more passionate about it. I think an important rule is no aesthetic posting
Aesthetic is an enemy of Christianity in my opinion
Why do you think Christianity can not be aesthetic? It is beautiful to me
personally i see it as one part of the equation.
most wordly religions are generally pointing to the same idea when you factor out cultural and social differences.
the conclusion is there for you to find for yourself.
try not to limit yourself to the set of texts you were born into you feel me?
in all honesty even if people limit themselves to one doctrine like you're saying people do, at the end of the day there is only one truth + one reality which is whatever is beyond us. all of these major religions can draw up their different dogmas and interpretations of the ancient scriptures and dedicate themselves to it, but ultimately the raft is not the shore. unfortunately some people never come to understand the timeless, eternal and transcendent unity that undergirds all of the major religions
it is what it is
in all honesty even if people limit themselves to one doctrine like you're saying people do, at the end of the day there is only one truth + one reality which is whatever is beyond us. all of these major religions can draw up their different dogmas and interpretations of the ancient scriptures and dedicate themselves to it, but ultimately the raft is not the shore. unfortunately some people never come to understand the timeless, eternal and transcendent unity that undergirds all of the major religions
it is what it is
concepts are just concepts. you have to experience the nature of non duality for yourself
concepts are just concepts. you have to experience the nature of non duality for yourself
i 100% agree, thats what im getting at by "understanding" the unity, you'll only get to that through experience
god isn't real
did you post this because you are curious and wanted someone to make an argument as to why god is real so you dont have to look it up yourself
The Blood of Jesus
Christ the Redeemer
The gospels of the New Testament is what made me Christian. There is more evidence from outside sources of Jesus than Plato. The Romans wrote about him, atheists are ignorant of history
personally i see it as one part of the equation.
most wordly religions are generally pointing to the same idea when you factor out cultural and social differences.
the conclusion is there for you to find for yourself.
try not to limit yourself to the set of texts you were born into you feel me?
What same idea do you think they're pointing to?
What same idea do you think they're pointing to?
a hindu would say life is a show god is playing for itself; the setting and all the actors are god himself.
a buddhist would say, we are all “jesus” because in reality there is nothing that is not god. we are all the speaker for god, because we are it;
this consciousness is god, the earth is god, subatomic particles. everything and everyone.
christianity and islam repackage these concepts into the stories of jesus and mohamad.
i know a decent chunk of traditional christians would find some offense to these concepts, but take away the stories and extraneous details and you really do come to the same central idea.
we (god) created this human experience, to experience the duality/opposite of god (which is this; personhood, self, other)
a dream in the consciousness of god
a hindu would say life is a show god is playing for itself; the setting and all the actors are god himself.
a buddhist would say, we are all “jesus” because in reality there is nothing that is not god. we are all the speaker for god, because we are it;
this consciousness is god, the earth is god, subatomic particles. everything and everyone.
christianity and islam repackage these concepts into the stories of jesus and mohamad.
i know a decent chunk of traditional christians would find some offense to these concepts, but take away the stories and extraneous details and you really do come to the same central idea.
we (god) created this human experience, to experience the duality/opposite of god (which is this; personhood, self, other)
a dream in the consciousness of god
Christianity is based on the life death and resurrection of Christ. Take that away and you don't have christianity.
Christianity is based on the life death and resurrection of Christ. Take that away and you don't have christianity.
not really the point of what i wrote or the question you asked me lol
not really the point of what i wrote or the question you asked me lol
I'm trying to say that Christianity doesn't teach pantheism. The whole "everything is god" is totally against what Christianity is about.
You said that "take away the stories and extraneous details and you have the same idea" But my point is that without the story of Christ, you don't have Christianity.
Christianity is a unique religion because it is based on the historical life and work of a person.
pantheistic beliefs are not anything new or profound. We are aware of them and told to reject them
pantheistic beliefs are not anything new or profound. We are aware of them and told to reject them
i completely disagree if im being honest.
non duality is absolutely a matter of personal inquiry rather than a matter of faith.
i completely disagree if im being honest.
non duality is absolutely a matter of personal inquiry rather than a matter of faith.
im not saying this physical universe is god, but that human experience is the yin to the yang which is god.
that is to say opposite, but not at all separate.
jesus christ conveys this reality. islam uses mohamad, the buddha uses himself.
i completely disagree if im being honest.
non duality is absolutely a matter of personal inquiry rather than a matter of faith.
It is very unclear what point you are trying to make in all that you have said thus far, and truly if it does anything it is to highlight, for anyone who cares to read along with this discussion, the importance of religion itself and the disservice to the self that is resorting to a personal idolatrous pseudospirituality. The importance of religion is the importance of doctrine, of having the doctrinal foundation on which to stand, so that one does not flounder within this world of falsity and imitation that we occupy today.
What you said, that “most worldly religions are generally pointing to the same idea” is wrong, insofar as all authentic tradition is quite literally ‘pointing’ to, and expressing the same true reality, it is only that the ‘clothing’ is variegated. Christianity in this regard affirms that reality is more than just a ‘dream in the consciousness of god’, as do Hinduism and Buddhism. In fact, one has to ‘factor in’ to use your terminology, such things as ‘cultural and social difference’ to truly understand this, to ‘factor it out’ is to discredit it itself, as the Gospel of the Lord says “two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other left.”
A dream, as Plato says is only an effusion of sense-perception accumulated during the daytime, and as the great Muslim ibn Arabi says one is most at risk of attack by the Satan in sleep, the messages we perceive to receive in dreams serve as an expression of this and we therefore must not always trust our dreams, do you trust reality? Surely if you propound to be an expert on the doctrines of the Far East I’m sure you are familiar with the parable of the butterfly in the Zhuangzhi. How does one know that reality is not just a dream? Because we must know that it is not, because we must not fall into false-belief wherein we feel at liberty to discount faith and turn words like ‘nonduality’ into idols, and think that we are above honest worship, humility, charity and love. As Lao Tsu says ‘the generals place is on the right, and the lieutenants is on the left’. Saying that ‘nonduality is a matter of personal inquiry’ is saying nothing, you’re already an ‘individual’, what matters is who the individual is that you are to be.
It is very unclear what point you are trying to make in all that you have said thus far, and truly if it does anything it is to highlight, for anyone who cares to read along with this discussion, the importance of religion itself and the disservice to the self that is resorting to a personal idolatrous pseudospirituality. The importance of religion is the importance of doctrine, of having the doctrinal foundation on which to stand, so that one does not flounder within this world of falsity and imitation that we occupy today.
What you said, that “most worldly religions are generally pointing to the same idea” is wrong, insofar as all authentic tradition is quite literally ‘pointing’ to, and expressing the same true reality, it is only that the ‘clothing’ is variegated. Christianity in this regard affirms that reality is more than just a ‘dream in the consciousness of god’, as do Hinduism and Buddhism. In fact, one has to ‘factor in’ to use your terminology, such things as ‘cultural and social difference’ to truly understand this, to ‘factor it out’ is to discredit it itself, as the Gospel of the Lord says “two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other left.”
A dream, as Plato says is only an effusion of sense-perception accumulated during the daytime, and as the great Muslim ibn Arabi says one is most at risk of attack by the Satan in sleep, the messages we perceive to receive in dreams serve as an expression of this and we therefore must not always trust our dreams, do you trust reality? Surely if you propound to be an expert on the doctrines of the Far East I’m sure you are familiar with the parable of the butterfly in the Zhuangzhi. How does one know that reality is not just a dream? Because we must know that it is not, because we must not fall into false-belief wherein we feel at liberty to discount faith and turn words like ‘nonduality’ into idols, and think that we are above honest worship, humility, charity and love. As Lao Tsu says ‘the generals place is on the right, and the lieutenants is on the left’. Saying that ‘nonduality is a matter of personal inquiry’ is saying nothing, you’re already an ‘individual’, what matters is who the individual is that you are to be.
buddhism absolutely alludes to reality being nothing more than a dream, in a sense.
the sense of a self, time, three dimensional space, consciousness, even god;
everything that is perceivable is made of no essential substance and is merely a delusion in the reality of the absolute.
everything appears in its own place, but there is no see-er. just seeing.
to a buddhist (from my perspective), the death of jesus christ exists as an allusion to the relinquishing of "I", in a world external to myself and its dualities; good, bad, me, not me.
I thought I existed, but upon further inquiry, i see that it was a delusion. in reality there is nothing. sunyata
this awakening; nirvanna, being what one could refer to as the rebirth of jesus christ. translated literally, extinguishing (of suffering). the delusion of (samsara) lifted.
being given these concepts at face value leads to rejection. stories or fables are a means of conveying the truth.
I can't claim to be absolutely correct, im simply sharing a perspective. I see these underlying themes in many doctrines, and i've read many works alluding to this same conclusion.
again. just a perspective.
It is very unclear what point you are trying to make in all that you have said thus far, and truly if it does anything it is to highlight, for anyone who cares to read along with this discussion, the importance of religion itself and the disservice to the self that is resorting to a personal idolatrous pseudospirituality. The importance of religion is the importance of doctrine, of having the doctrinal foundation on which to stand, so that one does not flounder within this world of falsity and imitation that we occupy today.
What you said, that “most worldly religions are generally pointing to the same idea” is wrong, insofar as all authentic tradition is quite literally ‘pointing’ to, and expressing the same true reality, it is only that the ‘clothing’ is variegated. Christianity in this regard affirms that reality is more than just a ‘dream in the consciousness of god’, as do Hinduism and Buddhism. In fact, one has to ‘factor in’ to use your terminology, such things as ‘cultural and social difference’ to truly understand this, to ‘factor it out’ is to discredit it itself, as the Gospel of the Lord says “two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other left.”
A dream, as Plato says is only an effusion of sense-perception accumulated during the daytime, and as the great Muslim ibn Arabi says one is most at risk of attack by the Satan in sleep, the messages we perceive to receive in dreams serve as an expression of this and we therefore must not always trust our dreams, do you trust reality? Surely if you propound to be an expert on the doctrines of the Far East I’m sure you are familiar with the parable of the butterfly in the Zhuangzhi. How does one know that reality is not just a dream? Because we must know that it is not, because we must not fall into false-belief wherein we feel at liberty to discount faith and turn words like ‘nonduality’ into idols, and think that we are above honest worship, humility, charity and love. As Lao Tsu says ‘the generals place is on the right, and the lieutenants is on the left’. Saying that ‘nonduality is a matter of personal inquiry’ is saying nothing, you’re already an ‘individual’, what matters is who the individual is that you are to be.
also damn bro where u learn to write like that
