Reply
  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    commonwrongdoer

    Cool, there are more verses about Jesus than Mary

    uh yes

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    jay bubonica

    uh yes

    Glad that you agree that Jesus is more important

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    commonwrongdoer

    Glad that you agree that Jesus is more important

    "my soul doth magnify the lord"

    mary

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    jay bubonica

    "my soul doth magnify the lord"

    mary

    "Glorify the LORD with me; let us exalt his name together" David

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    commonwrongdoer

    "Glorify the LORD with me; let us exalt his name together" David

    Tower of David is another title of the Virgin Mary that is not self-evident. Blessed John Henry Newman explains its meaning to us. King David is a type of Our Lord, and thus the Tower of David is a defence of Our Lord. And Mary is just that defence because all the veneration that she receives reinforces truths about his divinity. She does not eclipse Him; “He is infinitely above His Mother; and all that grace which filled her is but the overflowings and superfluities of His incomprehensible Sanctity.”

    Newman argues that countries which pay veneration to the Mother of Jesus keep faith in her Son’s Divinity and Humanity.

    Holy Mary, Tower of David, defend the Church, and pray for us that we may courageously teach and hold on to the truths about your Son.

    May 27
    Mary is the “Turris Davidica,” the Tower of David

    A TOWER in its simplest idea is a fabric for defence against enemies. David, King of Israel, built for this purpose a notable tower; and as he is a figure or type of our Lord, so is his tower a figure denoting our Lord’s Virgin Mother.

    She is called the Tower of David because she had so signally fulfilled the office of defending her Divine Son from the assaults of His foes. It is customary with those who are not Catholics to fancy that the honours we pay to her interfere with the supreme worship which we pay to Him; that in Catholic teaching she eclipses Him. But this is the very reverse of the truth.

    For if Mary’s glory is so very great, how cannot His be greater still who is the Lord and God of Mary? He is infinitely above His Mother; and all that grace which filled her is but the overflowings and superfluities of His incomprehensible Sanctity. And history teaches us the same lesson. Look at the Protestant countries which threw off all devotion to her three centuries ago, under the notion that to put her from their thoughts would be exalting the praises of her Son. Has that consequence really followed from their profane conduct towards her? Just the reverse—the countries, Germany, Switzerland, England, which so acted, have in great measure ceased to worship Him, and have given up their belief in His Divinity while the Catholic Church, wherever she is to be found, adores Christ as true God and true Man, as firmly as ever she did; and strange indeed would it be, if it ever happened otherwise. Thus Mary is the “Tower of David.”

    Meditations and Devotions, see www.newmanreader.org

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    jay bubonica

    uh oh heh

    well chief

    the pope is looking more and more like the antichrist every day

    i defended pope francis til i was blue in the face

    i recently prayed christ remove him

    god forgive me if im wrong

    gods design not my design

    You're not messing with me, no? Serious

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    megabowzer

    You're not messing with me, no? Serious

    i know Seventh Day Adventists believe that the pope is the antichrist

    many catholics are wondering the same thing because we have a neoliberal pope who crosses the line between Christianity and liberalism

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    jay bubonica

    Tower of David is another title of the Virgin Mary that is not self-evident. Blessed John Henry Newman explains its meaning to us. King David is a type of Our Lord, and thus the Tower of David is a defence of Our Lord. And Mary is just that defence because all the veneration that she receives reinforces truths about his divinity. She does not eclipse Him; “He is infinitely above His Mother; and all that grace which filled her is but the overflowings and superfluities of His incomprehensible Sanctity.”

    Newman argues that countries which pay veneration to the Mother of Jesus keep faith in her Son’s Divinity and Humanity.

    Holy Mary, Tower of David, defend the Church, and pray for us that we may courageously teach and hold on to the truths about your Son.

    May 27
    Mary is the “Turris Davidica,” the Tower of David

    A TOWER in its simplest idea is a fabric for defence against enemies. David, King of Israel, built for this purpose a notable tower; and as he is a figure or type of our Lord, so is his tower a figure denoting our Lord’s Virgin Mother.

    She is called the Tower of David because she had so signally fulfilled the office of defending her Divine Son from the assaults of His foes. It is customary with those who are not Catholics to fancy that the honours we pay to her interfere with the supreme worship which we pay to Him; that in Catholic teaching she eclipses Him. But this is the very reverse of the truth.

    For if Mary’s glory is so very great, how cannot His be greater still who is the Lord and God of Mary? He is infinitely above His Mother; and all that grace which filled her is but the overflowings and superfluities of His incomprehensible Sanctity. And history teaches us the same lesson. Look at the Protestant countries which threw off all devotion to her three centuries ago, under the notion that to put her from their thoughts would be exalting the praises of her Son. Has that consequence really followed from their profane conduct towards her? Just the reverse—the countries, Germany, Switzerland, England, which so acted, have in great measure ceased to worship Him, and have given up their belief in His Divinity while the Catholic Church, wherever she is to be found, adores Christ as true God and true Man, as firmly as ever she did; and strange indeed would it be, if it ever happened otherwise. Thus Mary is the “Tower of David.”

    Meditations and Devotions, see www.newmanreader.org

    Glorifying any being over the Lord is a basic disrespectful principle. "Thou shalt have no other gods before Me" is blatant on this issue.

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    jay bubonica

    Tower of David is another title of the Virgin Mary that is not self-evident. Blessed John Henry Newman explains its meaning to us. King David is a type of Our Lord, and thus the Tower of David is a defence of Our Lord. And Mary is just that defence because all the veneration that she receives reinforces truths about his divinity. She does not eclipse Him; “He is infinitely above His Mother; and all that grace which filled her is but the overflowings and superfluities of His incomprehensible Sanctity.”

    Newman argues that countries which pay veneration to the Mother of Jesus keep faith in her Son’s Divinity and Humanity.

    Holy Mary, Tower of David, defend the Church, and pray for us that we may courageously teach and hold on to the truths about your Son.

    May 27
    Mary is the “Turris Davidica,” the Tower of David

    A TOWER in its simplest idea is a fabric for defence against enemies. David, King of Israel, built for this purpose a notable tower; and as he is a figure or type of our Lord, so is his tower a figure denoting our Lord’s Virgin Mother.

    She is called the Tower of David because she had so signally fulfilled the office of defending her Divine Son from the assaults of His foes. It is customary with those who are not Catholics to fancy that the honours we pay to her interfere with the supreme worship which we pay to Him; that in Catholic teaching she eclipses Him. But this is the very reverse of the truth.

    For if Mary’s glory is so very great, how cannot His be greater still who is the Lord and God of Mary? He is infinitely above His Mother; and all that grace which filled her is but the overflowings and superfluities of His incomprehensible Sanctity. And history teaches us the same lesson. Look at the Protestant countries which threw off all devotion to her three centuries ago, under the notion that to put her from their thoughts would be exalting the praises of her Son. Has that consequence really followed from their profane conduct towards her? Just the reverse—the countries, Germany, Switzerland, England, which so acted, have in great measure ceased to worship Him, and have given up their belief in His Divinity while the Catholic Church, wherever she is to be found, adores Christ as true God and true Man, as firmly as ever she did; and strange indeed would it be, if it ever happened otherwise. Thus Mary is the “Tower of David.”

    Meditations and Devotions, see www.newmanreader.org

    Christ needs no one to defend Him. He commands legions of angels.

  • Dec 3, 2020
    megabowzer

    Glorifying any being over the Lord is a basic disrespectful principle. "Thou shalt have no other gods before Me" is blatant on this issue.

    but if you glorify the mother of God you're glorifying Jesus. Jesus loved his mother.

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    commonwrongdoer

    Christ needs no one to defend Him. He commands legions of angels.

    Christ needs his mother and so do we

    "..behold this is your mother"

    said from the cross

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    jay bubonica

    i know Seventh Day Adventists believe that the pope is the antichrist

    many catholics are wondering the same thing because we have a neoliberal pope who crosses the line between Christianity and liberalism

    I grew up as protestant, only have been SDA for 9 years. I do not believe he is the antichrist, however, I believe he is an obvious false prophet (like any other fool who believes they are the mouthpiece for God). God is meant to communicate directly to all men, not one man who can decide what God meant.

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    megabowzer

    I grew up as protestant, only have been SDA for 9 years. I do not believe he is the antichrist, however, I believe he is an obvious false prophet (like any other fool who believes they are the mouthpiece for God). God is meant to communicate directly to all men, not one man who can decide what God meant.

    the pope is not the mouthpiece of god, he's the vicar of christ, the first being peter, meaning that he is the earthly representative of Christ's church.

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    jay bubonica

    Christ needs his mother and so do we

    "..behold this is your mother"

    said from the cross

    Said to John, that's like thinking that today we will be with Christ in paradise because he said that to the thief on the cross.

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    jay bubonica

    Christ needs his mother and so do we

    "..behold this is your mother"

    said from the cross

    As a bodily personification of God's will, He is not wrong, we need our mothers, and definitely needed His. Now, are we to pray to her, and not directly to our Father? No. Our faith remains with Him, not her, she is a mere vessel.

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    commonwrongdoer

    Said to John, that's like thinking that today we will be with Christ in paradise because he said that to the thief on the cross.

    we will though

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    jay bubonica

    we will though

    Today?

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    megabowzer

    As a bodily personification of God's will, He is not wrong, we need our mothers, and definitely needed His. Now, are we to pray to her, and not directly to our Father? No. Our faith remains with Him, not her, she is a mere vessel.

    "mere vessel"

    all biblical evidence lies in the face of this falsehood

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    jay bubonica

    the pope is not the mouthpiece of god, he's the vicar of christ, the first being peter, meaning that he is the earthly representative of Christ's church.

    How can you rationalize this behavior knowing that the Catholic church is based on the fraud of indulgences?

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    commonwrongdoer

    Today?

    we are already living in god's kingdom on earth

  • Dec 3, 2020
    jay bubonica

    "mere vessel"

    all biblical evidence lies in the face of this falsehood

    Rather than persuading an insult to me, provide something that is irrefutable?

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    megabowzer

    How can you rationalize this behavior knowing that the Catholic church is based on the fraud of indulgences?

    because over time even popes get things wrong. the church has not always been right, we are made up of fallible men. but we are the church christ gave to peter

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    jay bubonica

    we are already living in god's kingdom on earth

    Earth is not heaven.

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    jay bubonica

    because over time even popes get things wrong. the church has not always been right, we are made up of fallible men. but we are the church christ gave to peter

    Your faith is based on Man. Mine is based in God. We are not the same... Good luck to you!

  • Dec 3, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    commonwrongdoer

    Earth is not heaven.

    new heaven, new earth.

    christ has risen

    were already living in the new kingdom