You sound ignorant

Who the hell is siding with China? Pakistan, Russia, Iran and North Korea

Edit: And that f***boy Tedros from WHO

Literally only Western countries are siding with the US lol

So Japan is siding with China?

They weren't on either of that list, but post-WW2 Japan has had a very different relationship with the US than most other non-Western countries.

you said: "The fact that other countries are siding with China over the US"

Again who is siding with China? Name them please...

US, Vietnam ties have never been better
asiatimes.com/2020/07/us-vietnam-ties-have-never-been-better

Bro people like him are why people who arent susceptible to western fear mongering concerning socialism and communism end up hating socialists/communist.

When you end up shaking your ass every f***ing time to absolve literal s***hole countries, you look like a tool. Literal "It looks like Noam Chomsky was 3 statements from denying the Cambodian gencoide" tier

"Oh bro, only western countries are siding with the US"

??? As opposed to f***ing North Korea, Russia, Nigeria (China is literally investing heavily in Africa), the UAE, etc...

How stupid do you have to be to willingly make this comparison??? Utter lack of critical thinking to think the average person is going to side against Japan, New Zealand, etc for Russia, NK, China, etc.

How do you possess such a low level of self awareness.

The worst part is, how if I google this Uighur denialism s*** it all leads back to some communism reddit. Why the f*** are you caping for f***ing regimes this hard when you yourself dont even believe them to be communist??? Stop trying to have your cake and eat it too.

Thats not @ you btw. Its at the clowns youre speaking with

hate this s*** feel like signing petitions won’t do anything either is there anything else we can do

There's literally a list on the previous page lol

Like imagine posting 50 countries and one of them is Duterte from the Philipines.

Yeah bro, Ill trust Kim Jong Un, Putin, and Duterte over Trudeau and Merkel.

The absolute nerve of some people

I don't deny the oppression of Uighurs in China? I even said that people siding with China over the US doesn't say anything about whether these claims are true or not lol.

Of all 50 countries you pick those 3 leaders

So disingenuous it's almost funny

People are rly either Dengist apologist for the Chinese state or neolibs that think China is literally Nazi Germany 2.0 it seems lol

The list is a f***ing joke cmon bruh

To be fair, the other world leaders siding with China aren’t exactly credible either

Yes, People’s Republic of China’s is Third German Reich

Not trying to get into this but like I said the list literally has nothing to do with credibility of any claims or any leaders and everything to do with whether countries want to have better relations with the US or China.

I know what you’re saying, I understand that China is a more favorable partner than the west for much of the third world. What I meant was there aren’t really any credible leaders on either side

I don't really what's going on, but I do know it better not be people tryna defend genocide

It is lol, either that or denying it

it's also probably more like they just don't care since it's not being done expansively, the hard truth is that most cultures dont really care about this type of stuff as long as it doesnt reach outside the borders of the participating country. near unlimited self-determination isnt that weird or foreign of a concept to most countries; like, for example, you think Saudi Arabia isn't on board with countries wanting to do whatever tf they want? The culture gap in universalist global morality vs relative self-determination is really only a western-european concept. This doesn't mean they necessarily endorse or agree, just that they don't think any form of intervention or condemnation matters if it's domestic. This is one of those things which we haven't really figured out, the whole local vs global morality thing. Admittedly I think a lot of western people struggle with this too; wanting to be non-interventionalist but also wanting to assert morality.
For the record I'm obviously not endorsing any of this as I've said earlier in the thread, I'm just saying the international situation regarding it is a lot more complicated than simply foreign policy relations or single morality decision-making

Maybe they’re trolling too hard lol

^should be obvious this is all these pr statements come down to