read between the lines of what i'm saying. the ambiguity of economic issues affect men a very specific way, but they aren't often included in conversations particular to those issues. the issues are not specific. the effects are.

What effects

Hope your local DSA crush sees this bro

do you agree yes or no that patriarchal ideas exist and that in many families generationally men are expected to be providers and have very specific roles and lives

I need this s*** over with

Not even saying you wrong but how is one of the most far right campaigns by a candidate ever in what Trump been saying bout migrants been winning over minorities???

Insane times

I see u skipped over my reply to u papa. Wonder why that is

Of course that’s why politicians don’t need to specify that they’re speaking to men.

at the end of the day a majority of people vote for who they think will make them richer or align with their values on other things

• theres that thing of thinking he's talking about the members of your group that you also hate and it's not about you

No, the problem is you don't understand these things actually need to be addressed on a sympathetic level to men. It actually matters significantly that men have lost historical roles and yet those expectations persist both in terms of societal pressures and policy. This has manifested in lots of negatives and toxic aspects of society.

I just asked for the effects last post

And what role have men lost?

come on dude. that men increasingly feel alienated and this alienation leads to toxicity which results in radicalism/etc? That men feel like they don't have roles in society or feel socially isolated from friends and partners? That men statistically have less friends, smaller social circles, and make less and live more paltry lives than ever before? That men increasingly have issues with integration in workplace and education? That men are having less kids and increasingly have gaps between family roles, expectations, and reality? What do you want me to do, link you scientific articles on male suicide before you're satisfied?

ban for trolling

bruh

i get disagreeing with someone. without even putting my hat into the ring about what yall were speaking about, i literally don't see how dude was trolling

why did you do this for a page and a half just to end up looking like a rehtard lmao

How the f*** is this a government issue besides make more money, which again is not exclusive to males

I mean all of those things are tied with the rise in manosohere and loser movements being prevalent worldwide

Im honestly shocked how yall think he’s remotely trying to diminish women’s plights under capitalism these are all easily observable facts :de

Are you just delusional or genuinely this stupid

Now look at all the Jordan Peterson clean your room dudes flocking in

All of this is precipites precisely due to the logic of capitalism needing to proleterianize women alongside policy allowing women better access to conctraceptives and more economic autonomy over the course of decades

Like this is deliberate government policy combined are you serious?

Nah you’re actually sad

Krishna typed out a well educated post and all you can do is s***post instead of saying idk

You’re not even arguing with conservatives

The rhetoric is indistinguishable from Andrew Tate and Peterson. The government can’t pass legislation to make women sleep with u sorry

Wait are we arguing contraception and economic autonomy is somehow a slight against males?