I think the “he fell for her trap” narrative is overblown. It’s a distraction from the larger more important headline which was he simply had a bad, substance-less debate.

Walz seems to be a little more comfortable than his first answer

that's on the moderators and honestly its fitting for U.S media and government

Are they mispronouncing Iran on purpose or what

The bean kicked in

How many times will he say first of all

I'm at 3

Lmao the fact-checkers are gonna get accused of left bias again

Feels like the Bush administration again

40 lol

Been an issue for decades and just made it through the next generation. Esp when its an adversary they couldn't care less to pronounce it right

I'll be honest, guy looks young for 40

Harder better faster stronger

JD Vance actually doesn't look bad here lmao

JD's gonna melt on this climate change question I'm thinking

Eyeliner does that

The whole concept of in-debate fact checking makes no sense to me cause a lot of the republicans platform would really just be one long fact check. Like, where do you draw the line?

rhetorical question

Tim should do well on this question

Vance has good debating mechanics.

Wtf are you talking s out did you hear his answers?

Corporate biglaw training

clean coal >>>>

Lmaoooo