S***in real life is like s***in a movie?

So this is going to prevent 11 year olds from watching p***?

I don't see anything wrong with one of the most influential and popular artists towards young kids speaking out about an issue they had and the negative results from it

Dumbass

there is nothing natural about watching s***on your phone and masturbating to it. There is nothing good about p*** and it has never benefitted anyone's lives

needa read and beat to more shakespearean p*** my boy

a little nuance is good. s***in movies is not the main point how it is in p***.

You said save the women's empowerment discussion for onlyfans .. but yeah it's the same as what I said

Theres also nothing natural about communicating with millions of people on the internet
bad argument

And I would say that depends on the kind of p*** you watch

god watches p***, he sees everything.

Doesn't have to be the same. Men ain't supposed to talk about women issues period

Oh brother

Not saying that it's gonna have a huge effect but if it changes one persons mind isn't that a good thing?

Cmon don't be obtuse

just talking from my own experiences

Oh brother
If you seriously think that not speaking for women on women's issues means not speaking about women at all, then I'm wasting my short time on earth interacting with you. Boy bye

Yeah our generation different like I remember being in middle school and niggas would have p*** on the PSPs watching that s*** ina crowd like Hoop highlights, me personally I always thought that was weird. Lookin back at it I could see how just having accessibility we had then will warp ya mind and then comparing it today… these kids got it bad

communication is natural brother. We've been communicating with f***ing letters and delivery animals for thousands of years. Watching another man f*** a b**** on ur phone and beating ur s*** to that is not natural. None of our ancestors did that s***. There is a reason p*** addiction is such a problem

WHAT

You're the one that said men shouldn't speak on women issues and you spoke about it two replies later

I listened to the head zookeeper at Zoo Miami talk about how they had a male ape who they thought was gay because he wouldn't attempt to mate with the female. They put him in the cage with another male and they began to fight. They put him back with the female, and played a video of apes mating where he could see. He got "excited" and proceeded to handle business

Of course it was Howard Stern who asked a weird-ass question like that

First off, I'm sorry that all that happened to you.

You make a good point about the fact that, in a world with online p*** ubiquitously available, it really does define what is perceived as sexually "normal" for so many young people

I was talking to my friend about this the other day -- online p*** is so much different from a***og p*** not only because of the ease of access but because of the sheer breadth of different p***ographic videos, images, GIFs, etc. available

when p*** is, to a user, magazines in a brown bag or even a collection of VHS tapes, there are a limited number of sexual acts which are "covered" by p*** -- one is much less likely to think that the map is the territory with regards to p*** and s***
but when there is an incalculable amount of p***ography online, with every conceivable s***act imaginable represented in some video somewhere, then one who is raised in a milieu where that is available begins to view p***ography as the exact boundaries of the conceptual sexual universe

which is to say, p*** and s***are the same thing

now of course considering the brazen and disgusting sexual degradation that characterizes so much online p***, this is harmful in the sense that it leads to experiences like yours and billie's, where one is lead to believe that sexual degradation is "normal" and that one is "expected" to degrade others and be degraded oneself

but there is another, arguably more pernicious (at least in scale) problem, which is that if s***is p***, one's imaginative capacity vis-a-vis s***and sexuality is impoverished

one approaches sex, and the manifold facets of human life related to it in some way (love, courtship, marriage, reproduction, sexual violence) with a mindset limited by the boundaries of the conceptual universe set by p***

the s***act is a performance -- one is in missionary, then after about five minutes, they switch to doggystyle, then five minutes later she gets on top, and this all happens not organically but conceptualized as following a video length bar with little lines to denote the start of the particular s***act

p***ography inherently categorizes sexual participants as well. if you are a black man, you might begin to think of yourself as the star of a BLACKED video, not as an individual actor with their own unique relationship to s***and sexuality not delimited by preexisting wank fodder

this actually goes even further than s***itself, and implicates more than p***. social media is essentially the p***ography of human interaction and sociality. people posting to create a persona and then match it are essentially p***ographizing themselves as social actors, enacting a parodically gonzo simulation of how people organically act IRL (or at least, how they used to before the p***ographization of the world). many of them do it for money, but the professional aspect is only part of it. those of us who do it for free are simply amateur social p*** actors

the millennial, zillennial or zoomer raised on online p*** begins to intuit that everything that is real is fake, and everything that is fake is real. this is not an inaccurate statement, either, when everyone else in your life was raised to believe the same thing