Reply
  • Jul 20, 2025
    Storari

    Jonathan Majors would have acted his way to Kang living up to Thanos, I’m sure of it

    He was always great, it’s the writers that were the issue

  • Jul 20, 2025
    Antidote

    Damn

    https://twitter.com/hollywoodhandle/status/1947010217239036319

    It wasn’t Kang! It was who you hired to write him!

  • Jul 20, 2025
    LUKAS

    idk i feel he is trying to rewrite the narrative over rehiring RDJ and Russo brothers as a panic reset after Majors

    they already started building kang with loki and ant-man

    ant man literally ends with scott panicking about more kangs and a post credits with a stadium of millions of them

    budget for that movie though was like 300M+ so if they did decide mid production he wasn’t working atp it was too late to even back out

  • Jul 20, 2025

    Always assumed Kang would've been beaten by doom in kangs dynasty I never thought they would give dooms biggest story to someone else

  • Jul 20, 2025
    Storari

    Jonathan Majors would have acted his way to Kang living up to Thanos, I’m sure of it

  • Jul 20, 2025
    Storari

    Jonathan Majors would have acted his way to Kang living up to Thanos, I’m sure of it

    Facts. Also they decided to put him in head scratching projects. Loki was a great show imo but how was he going to shape up as a Thanos via streaming content? Then there's Ant Man which was always going to be meh performing at best

    For several years they've seemed fully intent on the next big bad being an F4 villain. Why are they only just now getting around to this team? We realistically coulda had a far better avenue to build up either villain but now hype largely rests on the fact RDJ plays him. Even with us having an F4 movie they still didn't bother too

    Thanos got a proper tease in Avengers and intro in Guardians, which a realistic and smart opening to pursue. They just made s*** up the past few years and hoped it'd stick

  • Jul 20, 2025
    Antidote

    Damn

    https://twitter.com/hollywoodhandle/status/1947010217239036319

    Just a Hollywood exec trying to solidify a narrative

    They've had a rough few years and multiple expose articles written about their chaos. Its his job as president of the studio to project "stability."

  • Jul 21, 2025
    mjpplus

    He mentioned that he talked to RDJ about Doom BEFORE Ant-Man 3

    I think if Majors didn’t get caught up in that s*** he still would’ve served as a secondary antagonist to Doom

    I completely forgot about the Ant Man PCS nvm he lying through his teeth

  • Jul 21, 2025
    Antidote

    Damn

    https://twitter.com/hollywoodhandle/status/1947010217239036319

    This is pure bs from Fiege. The decision to have him lose to Ant-Man in his debut was a stupid move

  • Jul 21, 2025
  • Jul 22, 2025
    Antidote

    Damn

    https://twitter.com/hollywoodhandle/status/1947010217239036319

    they called me a mad man when i said this

  • Jul 22, 2025
    ·
    1 reply

    People forget and don’t even know. The first portrayals of Kang are to be the weakest. The main point is he has multiple variants and theirs infinite versions of him and one might be so cracked out he’s the smartest in the multiverse. One variant could be a AI version. Etc

    The Ant man Kang was never gonna win. And that’s not why the movie sucked.

    He’s a Reoccurring villain that terrorizes the multiverse. The first kangs should absolutely be beat.

    He could legit get beat, remember where he was and travel back to the future. Come back to the MCU timeline while their heroes can’t catch a breathe and wreck them.

    The basis of Kang is he gets beat and literally comes back stronger. Sucks we’ll never get to see it

  • Jul 22, 2025
    ·
    3 replies
    Xile44

    People forget and don’t even know. The first portrayals of Kang are to be the weakest. The main point is he has multiple variants and theirs infinite versions of him and one might be so cracked out he’s the smartest in the multiverse. One variant could be a AI version. Etc

    The Ant man Kang was never gonna win. And that’s not why the movie sucked.

    He’s a Reoccurring villain that terrorizes the multiverse. The first kangs should absolutely be beat.

    He could legit get beat, remember where he was and travel back to the future. Come back to the MCU timeline while their heroes can’t catch a breathe and wreck them.

    The basis of Kang is he gets beat and literally comes back stronger. Sucks we’ll never get to see it

    That’s comic s***, the casual audience goer would not understand that, and it would also make the stakes feel cheap if there was always a stronger Kang waiting for them every time they defeated one

  • Jul 22, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
  • Jul 22, 2025
    TheFader

    That’s comic s***, the casual audience goer would not understand that, and it would also make the stakes feel cheap if there was always a stronger Kang waiting for them every time they defeated one

    That’s the trick. Avengers strategically had to figure out
    how to stop them.

  • Jul 22, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    TheFader

    That’s comic s***, the casual audience goer would not understand that, and it would also make the stakes feel cheap if there was always a stronger Kang waiting for them every time they defeated one

    It's a comic book movie

    The movies that use more of an authentic approach have been the ones with warmer reception as of late, don't see why they couldn't do that

  • Jul 24, 2025
    TheFader

    That’s comic s***, the casual audience goer would not understand that, and it would also make the stakes feel cheap if there was always a stronger Kang waiting for them every time they defeated one

  • Jul 24, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    flootures

    It's a comic book movie

    The movies that use more of an authentic approach have been the ones with warmer reception as of late, don't see why they couldn't do that

    I get what he means tho, you want it to seem like this new big bad villain can’t be beat. He gotta be badder than Thanos because that’s where the bar has been set.

  • Jul 24, 2025
    Oscar Winner

    I get what he means tho, you want it to seem like this new big bad villain can’t be beat. He gotta be badder than Thanos because that’s where the bar has been set.

    They just did the same thing with Thanos in endgame tho and raked in the dough

    At least this stuff for Kang is baked into the character

  • BigSkinny đź§Š
    Jul 24, 2025
    ·
    1 reply

    Could they shoehorn Valeria in to doomsday and sw, maybe. I just hope they don’t give her story and connection with Doom to Franklin

  • Jul 24, 2025
    BigSkinny
    https://twitter.com/cosmic_marvel/status/1948387285516316745

    Could they shoehorn Valeria in to doomsday and sw, maybe. I just hope they don’t give her story and connection with Doom to Franklin

    half the movie just gonna be her from the waist up?

  • Jul 24, 2025
    ·
    2 replies

    i predict thor will be the one to see doom and assume its tony and think that he can reason with him which will lead to doom just outright killing him

    thor will be the sacrificial lamb to show the stakes, mark my words

  • Jul 24, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    Mr Carter

    i predict thor will be the one to see doom and assume its tony and think that he can reason with him which will lead to doom just outright killing him

    thor will be the sacrificial lamb to show the stakes, mark my words

    I thought that too until Feige said that he wants Hemsworth to play Thor for another 40 years