And that said coercion happened because he coerced her
Is what you literally just said
I beg you to look up what the legal term coercion means.
Here is an example for NY
nycourts.gov/judges/cji/2-PenalLaw/135/135-65(2).pdf
No, the words I have written do not entail coercion. There must be an implied threat. The mere solicitation for s***need not be a threat just because the person asking is male. The alleged victim did not really specify this in detail, understandably so because it was a rather short video and not a detailed charge. The most common threat in such situations is of course physical violence and rape.
I thought y'all kept bumping the other thread about him and eventually i read the last part of the title
I thought y'all kept bumping the other thread about him and eventually i read the last part of the title
lol
Thanks but I’m not reading a 2 year old thread when bro is obviously talking about people itt
Stay obtuse then
of course you wouldnt
Lol so if you’re referring to that then you should probably let it go
Lol so if you’re referring to that then you should probably let it go
Why let it go if the same logic is being applied in this very thread
Lol so if you’re referring to that then you should probably let it go
we linked news sources and two older threads
we posted examples of similiar scenarios and you like nah imma go off on feels
I beg you to look up what the legal term coercion means.
Here is an example for NY
https://www.nycourts.gov/judges/cji/2-PenalLaw/135/135-65(2).pdf
No, the words I have written do not entail coercion. There must be an implied threat. The mere solicitation for s***need not be a threat just because the person asking is male. The alleged victim did not really specify this in detail, understandably so because it was a rather short video and not a detailed charge. The most common threat in such situations is of course physical violence and rape.
REPEATED solicitation for s***(aka not taking no for an answer) from a man is coercion with the implied threat of physical violence. That’s all there is to it
1. whos taking shots at you nobody is taking shots at you, ....takes cheap shots lol
we linked news sources and two older threads
we posted examples of similiar scenarios and you like nah imma go off on feels
And what does that have to do with this thread? People are calling you out for having weird ass takes in general not because you haven’t staunchly picked a side. Saying “women I know wouldn’t put themselves in this situation” isn’t critically assessing, it’s victim blaming
And what does that have to do with this thread? People are calling you out for having weird ass takes in general not because you haven’t staunchly picked a side. Saying “women I know wouldn’t put themselves in this situation” isn’t critically assessing, it’s victim blaming
2. 
lmao
REPEATED solicitation for s***(aka not taking no for an answer) from a man is coercion with the implied threat of physical violence. That’s all there is to it
You could be right in this alleged instance. However, I wouldn't set that up as a rule, nor would any court, you are brushing with too broad strokes here. She would have to come out and say that (hasn't happened yet, could happen soon) and there would have to be further circumstances - for example, the locality matters. Repeated solicitations in a public, well-crowded area at daytime aren't the same as solicitations alone at home at night (the latter of which happened here).
not saying this to virtue signal but like its crazy to me that some people cant control themselves like its mindboggling
I couldn’t get it up back when I was drinking no matter f***ing what. I’ll never understand the allure of drunk intercourse