lack of comprehension now gaslighting
What are we getting wrong, genuinely?
Your takeaway is that no decent woman would let themselves get pressured into getting sexually assaulted
His takeaway is that Americans are too strict on what constitutes sexual assault
Did she say what he did exactly?
No. That it was non penetrative was all she said
Yall did this with Rex Orange County last year
Then in december it was stated he was innocent and sexual assault charges dropped.
variety.com/2022/music/news/rex-orange-county-sexual-assault-charges-dropped-1235468195
Every case isnt the same we care about victims but this story does not make sense.
Yes andrews "power" will be questioned.
I’ll never get how people immediately take sides without any evidence
This is all we are saying.
This is it. 13 pages of f***ing nonsense.
Yall did this with Rex Orange County last year
Then in december it was stated he was innocent and sexual assault charges dropped.
https://variety.com/2022/music/news/rex-orange-county-sexual-assault-charges-dropped-1235468195/
Every case isnt the same we care about victims but this story does not make sense.
Yes andrews "power" will be questioned.
But who in this thread is rallying against Andrew Callahan?
I won’t speak for others but my view is that if it’s true it’s disgusting and I won’t support him. I’ll take both sides stories in good faith.
You’re the one who seems to be taking sides prematurely
Yall did this with Rex Orange County last year
Then in december it was stated he was innocent and sexual assault charges dropped.
https://variety.com/2022/music/news/rex-orange-county-sexual-assault-charges-dropped-1235468195/
Every case isnt the same we care about victims but this story does not make sense.
Yes andrews "power" will be questioned.
Except most people ITT are proceeding with caution without pointing fingers probably specifically due to the ROC situation, at least I am.
What are we getting wrong, genuinely?
Your takeaway is that no decent woman would let themselves get pressured into getting sexually assaulted
His takeaway is that Americans are too strict on what constitutes sexual assault
No, too strict on what constitutes a "sexual power dynamic", "an abuse of power relations" and too loose on what responsibility adults have.
Coercion can also be a sexual crime too, this isn't in question anywhere.
There is a line in coercion as a crime generally speaking, of course I don't know the specific jurisdiction this happened in, that asks if the coerced person should have withstood the evil deed that was put into prospect. Not every threat is a coercion, otherwise those two crimes wouldn't need to be regarded separately. However, every coercion entails a threat.
The idea that some threats must be withstood (then: they are not coercion) and other must not be withstood (then: they are coercion) assumes a certain level of responsibility that every adult has. I do believe Americans in general infantilize too much, and any criticism against this is quickly painted as "victim blaming".
This however comes with the caveat that drunkenness might inhibit the ability to form and express one's will, which in turn relies on how drunk the person actually was. That will be impossible to say now 2 years later. Generally, different legal systems will use different BAC percentages to decide if a person's decision-making capabilities were inhibited or even completely suspended.
In this case, if the evil future deed threatened (via implication) was her being physically violated, then it would be sexual assault without a question. Of course, I am assuming for the sake of argument that this all happened, which is another topic completely.
If the evil future deed was something with vague YouTube connections like one user is implying, I really doubt that was something an adult person regardless of gender shouldn't have earnestly withstood. Anything else is once again an infantilization that isn't in line with our concepts of free will and responsibility that form the core tenets of criminal law. This can however be regarded differently if the alleged victim was sufficiently drunk.
Of course, this all boils down to "you ur a sexual assailant urself haha" in the brilliant legal and philosophical minds of KTT2.
But who in this thread is rallying against Andrew Callahan?
I won’t speak for others but my view is that if it’s true it’s disgusting and I won’t support him. I’ll take both sides stories in good faith.
You’re the one who seems to be taking sides prematurely
The reason i linked the rex orange county story is because the rex orange county ktt thread has 21 pages.
Nobody made a thread saying hes innocent after the charges were dropped and that people made premature accusations.
Again i am saying her story has holes in it.
We need to hear both sides.
Thread lock when
Yall did this with Rex Orange County last year
Then in december it was stated he was innocent and sexual assault charges dropped.
https://variety.com/2022/music/news/rex-orange-county-sexual-assault-charges-dropped-1235468195/
Every case isnt the same we care about victims but this story does not make sense.
Yes andrews "power" will be questioned.
Remember what the Justin Bieber story happened?
He wasn't even in the same city the night of the alleged crime. He was lucky enough to have kept his travel logs of like 6 years ago or otherwise his name would also have been ruined.
No, too strict on what constitutes a "sexual power dynamic", "an abuse of power relations" and too loose on what responsibility adults have.
Coercion can also be a sexual crime too, this isn't in question anywhere.
There is a line in coercion as a crime generally speaking, of course I don't know the specific jurisdiction this happened in, that asks if the coerced person should have withstood the evil deed that was put into prospect. Not every threat is a coercion, otherwise those two crimes wouldn't need to be regarded separately. However, every coercion entails a threat.
The idea that some threats must be withstood (then: they are not coercion) and other must not be withstood (then: they are coercion) assumes a certain level of responsibility that every adult has. I do believe Americans in general infantilize too much, and any criticism against this is quickly painted as "victim blaming".
This however comes with the caveat that drunkenness might inhibit the ability to form and express one's will, which in turn relies on how drunk the person actually was. That will be impossible to say now 2 years later. Generally, different legal systems will use different BAC percentages to decide if a person's decision-making capabilities were inhibited or even completely suspended.
In this case, if the evil future deed threatened (via implication) was her being physically violated, then it would be sexual assault without a question. Of course, I am assuming for the sake of argument that this all happened, which is another topic completely.
If the evil future deed was something with vague YouTube connections like one user is implying, I really doubt that was something an adult person regardless of gender shouldn't have earnestly withstood. Anything else is once again an infantilization that isn't in line with our concepts of free will and responsibility that form the core tenets of criminal law. This can however be regarded differently if the alleged victim was sufficiently drunk.
Of course, this all boils down to "you ur a sexual assailant urself haha" in the brilliant legal and philosophical minds of KTT2.
You typed all this just to say you don’t understand there’s an inherent physical power dynamic between men and women
You typed all this just to say you don’t understand there’s an inherent physical power dynamic between men and women
Just admit ur stupid and keep it moving
Remember what the Justin Bieber story happened?
He wasn't even in the same city the night of the alleged crime. He was lucky enough to have kept his travel logs of like 6 years ago or otherwise his name would also have been ruined.
Apparently if you question the locations of the girls that night youre a "weirdo".