Thread was locked by
a moderator
  • Apr 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    Joe Rogan gets way too much s***

    Honestly, If I was a centrist I wouldn't vote for Biden. Guy seems to have no idea what's going on unless it's something his team prepared him for

  • Apr 5, 2020
  • Apr 5, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
  • Apr 5, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Cudderwalks

    Joe Rogan gets way too much s***

    Honestly, If I was a centrist I wouldn't vote for Biden. Guy seems to have no idea what's going on unless it's something his team prepared him for

    Joe Rogan deserves all the s*** that he gets.

    I like him as an interviewer, but he lies and tells a lot of half truths and routinely says some flat out ed stuff sometimes.

  • Apr 6, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Buckleys Angel

    Joe Rogan deserves all the s*** that he gets.

    I like him as an interviewer, but he lies and tells a lot of half truths and routinely says some flat out ed stuff sometimes.

    Rogan is just a regular guy who happens to have a large following. He's not maliciously using his platform to spread disinfo - he just happens to know some crazy people who he thinks are entertaining. A lot of the time it feels like I'm listening to my dad talk when it comes to citing stuff he heard from friends mixed with news or books. I don't think he's ever claimed to be a serious pundit or source of information. I don't think Rogan is purposefully lying to people or claiming to be an alternative source of news, his guests often put words in his mouth for him in that regard.

  • krishna bound

    Rogan is just a regular guy who happens to have a large following. He's not maliciously using his platform to spread disinfo - he just happens to know some crazy people who he thinks are entertaining. A lot of the time it feels like I'm listening to my dad talk when it comes to citing stuff he heard from friends mixed with news or books. I don't think he's ever claimed to be a serious pundit or source of information. I don't think Rogan is purposefully lying to people or claiming to be an alternative source of news, his guests often put words in his mouth for him in that regard.

    He needs to filter out more political figures out from his platform. People are starting to take it as seriously as alternative news

  • Apr 6, 2020

    poll tax to vote now 🙄

    when democrats and republicans team up to kill their voters

  • Apr 6, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    soccerfanj
    https://twitter.com/crampell/status/1246783070310727682

    15 years Bush getting positive coverage like crazy, makes you think what Trump will get

  • neon 🍄
    Apr 6, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

  • Apr 6, 2020

    What a ghoul

  • Apr 6, 2020
    neon
    https://twitter.com/progressvoice/status/1247144306621558785

  • Apr 6, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    complete psychopaths

  • Apr 6, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    Cudderwalks

    15 years Bush getting positive coverage like crazy, makes you think what Trump will get

    Trump
    Will not be looked at positively

  • Apr 6, 2020
    soccerfanj

    Trump
    Will not be looked at positively

    oh he very well could be

  • Apr 6, 2020
    soccerfanj

    Trump
    Will not be looked at positively

    shiiiiiiit.

  • Apr 6, 2020

    nah. Look how books look at presidents like Andrew Jackson, Hoover, etc.

    Perhaps the books may say he was great at playing politics, but I can't see people saying he was great at his job (excluding his supporters)

  • Apr 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    DickerSpaniel

    complete psychopaths

    https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1247288752747274241

    This is the type of stuff that happens with a 5-4 court. Imagine how sour things will be when it becomes a 7-2 court once Trump wins. That's why we can not let him win! We are once again forced to vote for the lesser evil. smh.

  • Apr 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    fendi

    This is the type of stuff that happens with a 5-4 court. Imagine how sour things will be when it becomes a 7-2 court once Trump wins. That's why we can not let him win! We are once again forced to vote for the lesser evil. smh.

    yeah but even then biden personally helped give us like the 2 most conservative judges himself, it’s a lose-lose

  • Apr 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    DickerSpaniel

    yeah but even then biden personally helped give us like the 2 most conservative judges himself, it’s a lose-lose

    That’s not a very honest retelling of his time on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

    Also, he went toe to toe with Reagan over Robert Bork being appointed.

  • Apr 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Buckleys Angel

    That’s not a very honest retelling of his time on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

    Also, he went toe to toe with Reagan over Robert Bork being appointed.

    i mean the Anita Hill trials, which Biden was literally in charge of, fundamentally got us Clarence Thomas, no other way around it

    not to mention the “Biden Rule” effectively got us another conservative judge, (which i will not give him total “credit” for, ofc,) but is still worth noting

    the Bork stuff was one thing but (imo) that was politically beneficial to him at the time and not a sure fire indicator of where he stands on the matter today

  • DickerSpaniel

    i mean the Anita Hill trials, which Biden was literally in charge of, fundamentally got us Clarence Thomas, no other way around it

    not to mention the “Biden Rule” effectively got us another conservative judge, (which i will not give him total “credit” for, ofc,) but is still worth noting

    the Bork stuff was one thing but (imo) that was politically beneficial to him at the time and not a sure fire indicator of where he stands on the matter today

    His handling of the Anita Hill hearing was definitely a complete farce, but you made it seem like he went to bat for those guys. It’s irrelevant to what his role with the SC would be as president, and he never would have appointed Thomas himself.

  • Apr 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
Thread was locked by
a moderator