Aug 29, 2020
JaeRellHis only purpose was to attack and take away votes from Bernie.
The huge Bloomberg/Bernie overlap
Aug 29, 2020JaeRellHis only purpose was to attack and take away votes from Bernie.
Bernie’s fault for not going hard at Joe the entire time
- Aug 29, 2020·edited·3 repliesJaeRell
His only purpose was to attack and take away votes from Bernie.
realistically all Bernie had to do to win was (mostly) repackage his 2016 campaign, and focus more on calling out the record of those he ran against. instead he leaned hard into liberal idpol and DNC trump derangement. tulsi bombed but if bernie had ran the campaign the way she did he would have done so much better. his campaign just didn't resonate as much especially on a more populated field, and he surrounded himself with people who actively alienated what should otherwise be his voterbase.
(for clarity, it's not that others didn't do similar things, but rather bernie was already coming in as an outsider with a vendetta against him, so him leaning on those same unpopular things clearly exponentiated the dislike of him)
Aug 29, 2020·1 replykrishna boundrealistically all Bernie had to do to win was (mostly) repackage his 2016 campaign, and focus more on calling out the record of those he ran against. instead he leaned hard into liberal idpol and DNC trump derangement. tulsi bombed but if bernie had ran the campaign the way she did he would have done so much better. his campaign just didn't resonate as much especially on a more populated field, and he surrounded himself with people who actively alienated what should otherwise be his voterbase.
(for clarity, it's not that others didn't do similar things, but rather bernie was already coming in as an outsider with a vendetta against him, so him leaning on those same unpopular things clearly exponentiated the dislike of him)
Best explanation of why Bernie lost I've seen on here yet.
Aug 29, 2020https://twitter.com/lhfang/status/1299151168128430080krishna bound
Aug 29, 2020·2 repliesJaeRellHis only purpose was to attack and take away votes from Bernie.
How does this even make sense lmao
If anything Bloomberg would be taking votes from Biden, literally no one switched from Bernie to Bloomberg
- Aug 29, 2020·1 replyBasedBoy
How does this even make sense lmao
If anything Bloomberg would be taking votes from Biden, literally no one switched from Bernie to Bloomberg
Were you following his campaign? His whole message was attacking progressive policy and the Dems moving "too far left" with Bernie. His only purpose was psychological warefare on those who were hesitant to fully commit to Bernie's message.
- Aug 29, 2020·1 replyJaeRell
Were you following his campaign? His whole message was attacking progressive policy and the Dems moving "too far left" with Bernie. His only purpose was psychological warefare on those who were hesitant to fully commit to Bernie's message.
Than why would Bloomberg actually run and take votes from other centrist candidates instead of just making some PACs to run ads for the existing more popular candidates?
- Aug 29, 2020BasedBoy
Than why would Bloomberg actually run and take votes from other centrist candidates instead of just making some PACs to run ads for the existing more popular candidates?
He never had a chance of winning. His name recognition and publicity was more harmful to Bernie's message than any funding of some PAC.
- Aug 29, 2020·edited·1 replyYoung D
Best explanation of why Bernie lost I've seen on here yet.
You really think that attacking Biden would have done it for him? I don’t think he did anything wrong tactically, I just think that he got massively let down by his voter base.
I think he already kind of had a reputation for being kind of hostile and curmudgeonly, and going hard after people wasn’t going to win over any of the more moderate, older vote that he would have needed to swing in order to win it.
Aug 29, 202087% sure Kamala’s butt stinks
- Aug 30, 2020Buckleys Angel
You really think that attacking Biden would have done it for him? I don’t think he did anything wrong tactically, I just think that he got massively let down by his voter base.
I think he already kind of had a reputation for being kind of hostile and curmudgeonly, and going hard after people wasn’t going to win over any of the more moderate, older vote that he would have needed to swing in order to win it.
did you really only get "not attacking biden is why he didn't win" from my post?
Aug 30, 2020·1 replyany attempts at a***yzing why bernie lost without looking at the media blitz is irresponsible lol.
also voter suppression, and even then youth turnout being low isn't why he lost. it was as good as it should have been expected to be. it's not like he can all of a sudden force them to make up a larger share of the electorate.
- Aug 30, 2020
media = making this whole thing about who is the most likely candidate to beat trump
also media = constantly telling us that bernie won't be able to beat trump because of the whole socialist thing so he's not electable
trump = campaigns by calling biden and his team a trojan horse for the radical left while branding moderate democrats radical marxists.
- Aug 30, 2020krishna bound
realistically all Bernie had to do to win was (mostly) repackage his 2016 campaign, and focus more on calling out the record of those he ran against. instead he leaned hard into liberal idpol and DNC trump derangement. tulsi bombed but if bernie had ran the campaign the way she did he would have done so much better. his campaign just didn't resonate as much especially on a more populated field, and he surrounded himself with people who actively alienated what should otherwise be his voterbase.
(for clarity, it's not that others didn't do similar things, but rather bernie was already coming in as an outsider with a vendetta against him, so him leaning on those same unpopular things clearly exponentiated the dislike of him)
it was wild in real time for us normies joking about him playing s*** too passively back in like january and in debates...and then he kept that strat up until it was too late lol
really is depressing he loss with what looked like such a lay up coming into that super tuesday. that's going to probably go down as one of the worst days in post Obama politics lol
- Aug 30, 2020
Frog"But so I think, I think it would be, I think it would be very, very, I think we'd have a very, very solid, we would continue what we're doing, we'd solidify what we've done, and we have other things on our plate that we want to get done,"
this is what some posters itt called "fye"
- Aug 30, 2020Synopsis
any attempts at a***yzing why bernie lost without looking at the media blitz is irresponsible lol.
also voter suppression, and even then youth turnout being low isn't why he lost. it was as good as it should have been expected to be. it's not like he can all of a sudden force them to make up a larger share of the electorate.
i explicitly mentioned in my post the pre-existing vendetta against him was a factor. however even given that it's impossible not to think bernie himself didn't blow it this time too separately; it's not like Bernie is the first candidate to have a media and party vendetta against him. his campaign was not as strong as 2016 and he played too much into alienating politics. he was never gonna win off solely off of youth voters and his rhetoric was not as appealing to the working class as it was last time he ran.
- Aug 30, 2020JaeRell
If Biden actually goes that route
rip. Blue check liberals will try to cosign that nonsense too.
Bernie lost and still be on Twitch like every week hosting town halls and s*** and they really keeping Biden in the rejuvenation chamber, smh.
I honestly think its preferable to having him railroaded by Donald and his pot shots
if Tulsi was allowed to do what she shoulda been allowed to do, Biden would literally be done.
Aug 30, 2020krishna boundrealistically all Bernie had to do to win was (mostly) repackage his 2016 campaign, and focus more on calling out the record of those he ran against. instead he leaned hard into liberal idpol and DNC trump derangement. tulsi bombed but if bernie had ran the campaign the way she did he would have done so much better. his campaign just didn't resonate as much especially on a more populated field, and he surrounded himself with people who actively alienated what should otherwise be his voterbase.
(for clarity, it's not that others didn't do similar things, but rather bernie was already coming in as an outsider with a vendetta against him, so him leaning on those same unpopular things clearly exponentiated the dislike of him)
- Aug 31, 2020·1 reply
Fox News hilarious for this title
Sep 1, 2020·1 replyShabazz999Fox News hilarious for this title
That seems actually an apt title unless im wrong
still fuc fox tho
- Sep 1, 2020·1 replyspongebob
That seems actually an apt title unless im wrong
still fuc fox tho
Theyre using AOC as a boogeyman to rile up conservatives, Markey is an accomplished senator there was no need to mention her in the title
Sep 1, 2020Make sure to vote for your local elections too. It’s important
- Sep 1, 2020Shabazz999
Theyre using AOC as a boogeyman to rile up conservatives, Markey is an accomplished senator there was no need to mention her in the title
Oh yeah I know she lives in their heads rent free
AOC though 
Sep 1, 2020lmaooo