Reply
  • Updated

  • ·
    1 reply

    Not at all because I don't use any of that dog s***.

  • WINTER 🌨️

    not cooked at all

  • I'd be good

  • U musta said that wrong cus it dont rly make sense

  • Hazyeyefreakmonstr

    U musta said that wrong cus it dont rly make sense

    I think he’s wanking to profiles

  • Oooh i see what youre trying to say

    Besides tik tok id be good

  • Three Meows Mór

    I think he’s wanking to profiles

    Safe assumption

  • ·
    2 replies
    Showroom
    · edited

    edit ya title mane

  • insertcoolnamehere

    edit ya title mane

    How cooked....if social media platforms showed which profiles you viewed and how long

  • insertcoolnamehere

    edit ya title mane

    Done

  • Hazyeyefreakmonstr

    How cooked....if social media platforms showed which profiles you viewed and how long

    @op

  • ·
    2 replies

    nigga who tf are you lurking outside of a recent ex

  • c0raline

    Not at all because I don't use any of that dog s***.

    but ur making alts on a kanye forum, thats considered worse in the eyes of the lord

  • Valentine

    nigga who tf are you lurking outside of a recent ex

    Man I got this twitter crush. Shawty fine as hell. I be going thru her timeline every time she pops up

    "BITCH IM NOT A STALKER, BUT BABY I ALWAYS WATCH YA"

  • Valentine

    nigga who tf are you lurking outside of a recent ex

    im lurking urs

  • 1h everyday on pinkpantheress profile

  • im straight up a stalker im finished

  • Not really. I checked out one persons profile once in like 2 years.

  • ·
    1 reply
    · 
    Three Meows Mór

    I think he’s wanking to profiles

    What are the ethical implications of this? Is it right to sexualize someone who isn't a s***worker in this way?

  • Why would you do some s*** you wouldn't want the person to find out about?

  • Jawn Legend

    What are the ethical implications of this? Is it right to sexualize someone who isn't a s***worker in this way?

    2 school of thoughts would be permissible private thoughts and fantasies, which are generally considered part of a person’s inner life and are ethically okay or impermissible actions involving another person without their consent, objectifying them and dehumanising them for your pleasure

    Either way it’s disrespectful of autonomy and and crosses ethical boundaries due to consent
    Consequentialism vs Action-Based Ethics

    However op is then asking what if it wasn’t that private after all and your subject could work out your wrongdoings. It would surely be impermissible then

    Which brings the conversation into current modern tech advancements and privacy concerns

  • chip skylark 🏄🏾‍♂️
    Showroom